2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.83.060412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-pressure study of the phase transition in the itinerant ferromagnetCoS2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5. As seen, the phase line obtained from X-ray diffraction differs significantly from that determined from electrical resistivity, susceptibility and heat capacity data [12]. Obviously, calibrations of the low temperature ruby pressure scale and the scale based on the superconducting transition temperature of lead greatly disagree.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…5. As seen, the phase line obtained from X-ray diffraction differs significantly from that determined from electrical resistivity, susceptibility and heat capacity data [12]. Obviously, calibrations of the low temperature ruby pressure scale and the scale based on the superconducting transition temperature of lead greatly disagree.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This situation seems to be not common. For instance, in the case of the helical magnet MnSi a reverse relationship is observed between compressibilities of the coexisting magnetic [12]. Curve 2 was determined by X-ray diffraction and the pressure measured by a ruby sensor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations