2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2019.112276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-pressure experimental vapour-liquid-liquid equilibrium measurements and modelling for natural gas processing: Equipment validation, and the system CH4+nC6H14+H2O

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously mentioned, the CPA approach has been successfully applied by several authors for systems involving glycols. ,,,,,, The version of sCPA presented here has been developed over the past decade at the Hydrates, Flow Assurance & Phase Equilibria Research Group at Heriot-Watt University. Predictions for water/TEG were presented by Chapoy et al, while predictions for CH 4 /H 2 O are discussed in Chapoy et al Parameters for TEG are reproduced in Table , and an adjusted expression for parameter c 1 in eq is given by eq .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As previously mentioned, the CPA approach has been successfully applied by several authors for systems involving glycols. ,,,,,, The version of sCPA presented here has been developed over the past decade at the Hydrates, Flow Assurance & Phase Equilibria Research Group at Heriot-Watt University. Predictions for water/TEG were presented by Chapoy et al, while predictions for CH 4 /H 2 O are discussed in Chapoy et al Parameters for TEG are reproduced in Table , and an adjusted expression for parameter c 1 in eq is given by eq .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the new advances, cubic equations of state (CEoS) are still a benchmarked standard, widely used in the oil and gas industry. Systems involving glycols, water, and hydrocarbons have been modeled with modified versions of the traditional SRK or PR CEoS by several authors. ,, A general form of these models can be written as for which δ 1 = 1 and δ 2 = 0 for SRK or δ 1 = 1 + √2 and δ 2 = 1 – √2 for PR. In addition, the appropriate expression for a *­( T ) is composition dependent and is related to the chosen approach as shown in Table .…”
Section: Thermodynamic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%