2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2005.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-pressure and high-temperature synthesis of a cubic IrO2 polymorph

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
15
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…72 Similar phase stability order for IrO 2 was also previously reported using PBE calculations, while PBEsol and AM05 functionals resulted in the pyrite phase being more stable than the columbite phase. 72 Similar phase stability order for IrO 2 was also previously reported using PBE calculations, while PBEsol and AM05 functionals resulted in the pyrite phase being more stable than the columbite phase.…”
Section: Bulk Propertiessupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…72 Similar phase stability order for IrO 2 was also previously reported using PBE calculations, while PBEsol and AM05 functionals resulted in the pyrite phase being more stable than the columbite phase. 72 Similar phase stability order for IrO 2 was also previously reported using PBE calculations, while PBEsol and AM05 functionals resulted in the pyrite phase being more stable than the columbite phase.…”
Section: Bulk Propertiessupporting
confidence: 78%
“…For the high pressure pyrite phase, the value of a = 4.96 Å predicted GPa and is in good agreement with the experimental value of 306 GPa 72. For the high pressure pyrite phase, the value of a = 4.96 Å predicted GPa and is in good agreement with the experimental value of 306 GPa 72.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The stiffest rutile oxide is SiO2 and the softest one is PbO2, which is in agreement with the bonding analysis (see Figure 2) since SiO2 possesses the strongest bonds. The obtained elasticity values at 300 K are consistent with the available experimental data, deviating by 7.8% for TiO2 [65], 2.4% for CrO2 [2], 16.1% for MnO2 [66], 2.6% for NbO2 [67], 5.4% for OsO2 [68], 9.9% for IrO2 [69], 0.3% for PbO2 [70], and 7.9% for SiO2 [71]. This is acceptable based on the employed exchange-correlation functional, since deviations are commonly within 20% [72].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The Y value slowly decreases with T, as expected, and the difference between the values for these binary oxides is constant. The stiffest rutile oxide is SiO 2 and the softest one is PbO 2 , which is in agreement with the bonding analysis (see Figure 2) [69], 0.3% for PbO 2 [70], and 7.9% for SiO 2 [71]. This is acceptable based on the employed exchange-correlation functional, since deviations are commonly within 20% [72].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%