2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2010.04.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-precision technique for in-situ testing of the PZT scanner based on fringe analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, the traditional Michelson interferometer is used in the literature [2]. The system used a PZT driver to drive the mirror to be measured [5], generating dynamic interference fringes. The ellipse fitting algorithm [6] was[XM1] combined with theoretical derivation to measure the two-dimensional tilt angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the traditional Michelson interferometer is used in the literature [2]. The system used a PZT driver to drive the mirror to be measured [5], generating dynamic interference fringes. The ellipse fitting algorithm [6] was[XM1] combined with theoretical derivation to measure the two-dimensional tilt angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method is susceptible to damage to the measured surfaces during multiple applications of Vaseline and cleanings. Another disadvantage of this method is that it takes a long time to measure because only a single surface can be measured one at a time on the measured surface, and information on the optical thickness variation of the transparent parallel measured part cannot be obtained [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optical methods, such as autocollimators, interferometers and so on, are generally used for high-precision angle measurement. Recently, the method based on fringe analysis is presented to measure high-precision two-dimensional angles [3][4][5], which can be realized by obtaining good interference fringes. Compared with CCD receiving interference fringes, QPD is often used for receiving interference fringes because of its small volume and driving simply.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%