2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.90.012009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High precision determination of theQ2evolution of the Bjorken sum

Abstract: We present a significantly improved determination of the Bjorken Sum for 0.6≤ Q 2 ≤4.8 GeV

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
91
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
4
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that χP T describes our results for Γ 1 only up to very moderate Q 2 ≈ 0.08 GeV 2 (within our statistical and systematic uncertainties), while there is only rough agreement in magnitude between χP T and our data for the forward spin polarizability γ 0 . Finally, we would like to refer the reader to a recent analysis of the world data [103], including the data presented here, to study the first moment of the difference g p 1 − g n 1 and its Q 2 -dependence to extract Operator Product Expansion matrix elements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We find that χP T describes our results for Γ 1 only up to very moderate Q 2 ≈ 0.08 GeV 2 (within our statistical and systematic uncertainties), while there is only rough agreement in magnitude between χP T and our data for the forward spin polarizability γ 0 . Finally, we would like to refer the reader to a recent analysis of the world data [103], including the data presented here, to study the first moment of the difference g p 1 − g n 1 and its Q 2 -dependence to extract Operator Product Expansion matrix elements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7. /M 2 = −0.047, Λ qcd = 311 MeV, together with Jlab data [6]: black point, the single red point higher is the COMPASS result 0.181 ± 0.008 stat. ± 0.014 syst.…”
Section: Practical Analysis Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were realized as the "cut (truncated) Mellin moments" (CMM) f (z; n, µ 2 ) = 1 z f (x, µ 2 )x n−1 dx, generalized moments of the parton distribution f (x, µ 2 ) in the unavoidable lower limit of integration z ≡ x min = Q 2 min /(2(P q) max ) > 0, and in this way the kinematic constraint can be taken into account. This circumstance can be the main reason for large uncertainties at data processing: this effect is aggravated if a singularity of f (x, µ 2 ) in the neighborhood of x = 0 is expected [6]. The idea of "truncated" Mellin moments of the parton densities in QCD analysis was introduced and developed in the late 1990s [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analogous comparison can be performed for the obtained Bjorken sum rule representation with the Bjorken sum rule most recent data, determined in [45] for the Q 2 ≤ 4.8 GeV 2 region.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%