2007
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-precision astrometry on the VLT/FORS1 at time scales of few days

Abstract: Aims. We investigate the accuracy of astrometric measurements with the VLT/FORS1 camera and consider potential applications. Methods. The study is based on two-epoch (2000 and 2002/2003) frame series of observations of a selected Galactic Bulge sky region that were obtained with FORS1 during four consecutive nights each. Reductions were carried out with a novel technique that eliminates atmospheric image motion and does not require a distinction between targets and reference objects. Results. The positional as… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For earlier runs of the MCMC analysis, we placed much wider constraints of ±200 mas on CDAR parameters ρ FORS2 and d FORS2 , finding the two parameters to be tightly correlated (see Figure 3 from Lazorenko et al (2007), which uses different units). This linear relationship between ρ FORS2 and d FORS2 is shown in our Figure 7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For earlier runs of the MCMC analysis, we placed much wider constraints of ±200 mas on CDAR parameters ρ FORS2 and d FORS2 , finding the two parameters to be tightly correlated (see Figure 3 from Lazorenko et al (2007), which uses different units). This linear relationship between ρ FORS2 and d FORS2 is shown in our Figure 7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total telescope time used over two years was ∼15 nights including overheads. The data reduction methods used to extract the target's astrometry from the raw images are described in Lazorenko (2006) and Lazorenko et al (2011Lazorenko et al ( , 2009Lazorenko et al ( , 2007) (see also JS13 and Sahlmann 2012). However, because of the large amount of collected data in the present programme, it was possible to significantly improve the reduction, in particular the mitigation of systematic errors.…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reductions were based on the method previously applied to FORS1/2 observations (Lazorenko et al 2007(Lazorenko et al , 2009. The method was shown to efficiently mitigate atmospheric image motion, geometric field distortion, DCR, and other effects, thus ensuring stable precision over time scales of a few days to a few years.…”
Section: Astrometric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%