2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2014.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-precision AMS 14 C chronology for Gatecliff Shelter, Nevada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a test of synchroneity, it is ideal to have numerous, highly accurate, and precise dates to develop robust chronological models (6). The term "date" represents a measured value, and "age" refers to real or modeled calendar years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a test of synchroneity, it is ideal to have numerous, highly accurate, and precise dates to develop robust chronological models (6). The term "date" represents a measured value, and "age" refers to real or modeled calendar years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional statistical analysis of 14 C dates from archaeological contexts has relied on probability distributions to determine the likelihood that two dated events were sequential or contemporaneous. The Bayesian approach, on the other hand, incorporates a priori contextual and stratigraphic information obtained in the field within modeled sequences of 14 C dates to constrain probability distributions (Buck et al 1991;Bayliss and Bronk Ramsey 2004;Bronk Ramsey et al 2010;Culleton et al 2012;Inomata et al 2013Inomata et al , 2014Douka et al 2014;Higham et al 2014;Kennett et al 2014;McClure et al 2014;Bronk Ramsey 2015;Huster and Smith 2015). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiocarbon, Vol 58, Nr 1, 2016, p 69-87 DOI:10.1017/RDC.2015.7 © 2016 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona to estimate the timing of events including the settlement and growth of the site (Beramendi-Orosco et al 2009;Bronk Ramsey et al 2010;Kennett et al 2011Kennett et al , 2014Prufer et al 2011;Culleton et al 2012;Inomata et al 2013Inomata et al , 2014Jazwa et al 2013;Lesure et al 2014;Hoggarth et al 2014;Smith et al 2014;Bronk Ramsey 2015;Huster and Smith 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We especially hope that students will understand the long-term potential that these methods have for transforming our current understandings of chronology in the Southeast. This ultimately should orient our field to depend less on legacy (and in many cases chronologically outdated) culturehistoric artifact chronologies, and more on decadalscale probabilistic chronologies from high-quality Bayesian modeling (for example, see Bayliss et al [2007]; Bayliss [2009]; Hamilton et al [2015]; Kennett et al [2013Kennett et al [ , 2014; Whittle et al [2011]). We hope that eventually all major southeastern culture-historic chronologies will undergo the rigorous, robust re-dating and Bayesian re-thinking that is currently being done for key European chronologies (Conneller et al 2016;Garrow et al 2009;Macsween et al 2015;Sheridan and Bayliss 2008;Whittle et al 2011.…”
Section: The Final Frontier? Bayesian Approaches In the American Soutmentioning
confidence: 99%