2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.04.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High phylogeographic structure in sylvatic vectors of Chagas disease of the genus Mepraia (Hemiptera: Reduviidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Campos et al ( 2013 ) found three lineages of Mepraia , congruent with the current recognized species. All populations tested were highly structured, suggesting that they have not been affected by strong bottlenecks and/or experienced sudden demographic changes due to repeated climatic fl uctuations.…”
Section: Phylogeographysupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Campos et al ( 2013 ) found three lineages of Mepraia , congruent with the current recognized species. All populations tested were highly structured, suggesting that they have not been affected by strong bottlenecks and/or experienced sudden demographic changes due to repeated climatic fl uctuations.…”
Section: Phylogeographysupporting
confidence: 78%
“…() for M. spinolai , and because M. gajardoi is a close species to M. spinolai and part of the Spinolai complex as suggested by Campos et al . (, ), this species could also delay defaecation on hosts, which would make it a less‐efficient vector under natural conditions. However, the feeding behaviour of M. gajardoi has not been studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results reported by Canals et al (1999) for M. spinolai and T. infestans suggest that because of the differences in their defaecation behaviour once they feed on their hosts, T. infestans would be a better vector than M. spinolai that takes more time to release their droppings, whereas T. infestans do so immediately. When considering the results of Canals et al (1999) for M. spinolai, and because M. gajardoi is a close species to M. spinolai and part of the Spinolai complex as suggested by Campos et al (2013aCampos et al ( , 2013b, this species could also delay defaecation on hosts, which would make it a less-efficient vector under natural conditions. However, the feeding behaviour of M. gajardoi has not been studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toledo et al () collected 397 adults and nymphs of M. gajardoi at five locations in the coastal region of northern Chile. Campos et al () collected 65 of M. gajardoi , 27 of M. parapatrica, and 72 of M. spinolai , including adults and nymphs, in 13 localities located between 18º and 33º S of the coastal region and valleys in the interior of Chile. Egaña et al () collected 70 3 rd , 4 th , and 5 th instar nymphs of M. gajardoi in the northern zone of Chile and 65 nymphs of 3 rd , 4 th , and 5 th instars of M. spinolai in central Chile.…”
Section: Information On Collections Of Three Species Of Mepraia In Chmentioning
confidence: 99%