2020
DOI: 10.1057/s41267-019-00295-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-performance work systems and organizational performance across societal cultures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior studies have shown limited congruence of these characteristics with high-performance and high-involvement HRM systems (Jiang et al, 2015; Rabl et al, 2014). For instance, in a study of 7187 employees across 14 countries, Dastmalchian et al (2020) have found opportunity-enhancing practices (including participative work design and decision-making) to be less effective in high-power-distance cultures; however, it is highly effective in low-power-distance cultures. It is, therefore, quite natural to have doubts on the viability and effectiveness of such advanced Western HRM systems in the Indian context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies have shown limited congruence of these characteristics with high-performance and high-involvement HRM systems (Jiang et al, 2015; Rabl et al, 2014). For instance, in a study of 7187 employees across 14 countries, Dastmalchian et al (2020) have found opportunity-enhancing practices (including participative work design and decision-making) to be less effective in high-power-distance cultures; however, it is highly effective in low-power-distance cultures. It is, therefore, quite natural to have doubts on the viability and effectiveness of such advanced Western HRM systems in the Indian context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IB has developed considerable expertise using Hofsteder's power-distance and other hierarchical institutional strength variables (Hofstede 2006). Recent work includes Mahajan and Toh (2017), Cao et al (2018), Maseland, Dow and Steel (2018), Tung and Stahl (2018), Kostova et al (2019), and Dastmalchian (2020) 14 A parallel discussion in IB pits internalization against diversification in MNE expansion, e.g., Rugman (1976), Agmon and Lessard, (1977), Caves (1982), Yeung, (1991, 1992), Kwok and Reeb (2000).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The organizational results may refer to efficiency, productivity, innovativeness, quality of products/services, and competitive advantage (Acosta-Prado et al, 2020; Arthur, 1994; Becker and Gerhart, 1996; Birdi et al, 2008; Easa and Orra, 2020; Ferguson and Reio, 2010; Huselid, 1995; Huselid et al, 1997; Paawe and Ferndale, 2017; Pfeffer and Veiga 1999; Sparrow et al, 2016; Stor and Haromszeki, 2020b). The research within the managerial results in most cases refers to the interrelations and levels of coherence between business strategies and particular subfunctions of HRM with company’s performance results (Beer et al, 1984; Bello-Pintado, 2015; Chanda and Shen, 2009; Dastmalchian et al, 2020; Jashari and Kutllovci, 2020; Guest, 1997; Guest et al, 2011; Schuler and Jackson, 1987; Stor and Suchodolski, 2016; Wright and Snell, 1991, 1995). And the behavioral results may include work flexibility, employee attitudes, participation, job performance, employee learning, employee performance, employee engagement and satisfaction, employee and/ or managerial interpersonal relations, employee competency development, and leadership development (Ferguson and Reio, 2010; Juchnowicz, 2010; Nagy, 2002; Peretz et al, 2018; Rich et al, 2010; Sparrow et al, 2016; Stor and Haromszeki, 2019; Taamneh et al, 2018; Villajos et al, 2019; Wickramasinghe and Liyanage, 2013).…”
Section: The Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%