2006
DOI: 10.1080/09585190500366466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-performance work systems and firms' operational performance: the moderating role of technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…• If an establishment received a score of less than 15 on the multiple job tasks scale and less than 21 on the decisions type scale; then both variables were coded as follows: HPWSJobDesign received a score of '0' and THRMSJobDesign was assigned a score of '0'. (Arthur 1992;Way 2002;Yount et al 1996;Becker and Huselid 1998;Kintana 2006). This study differs from previous HR research in that it develops two separate HR system indices that represent different approaches in managing the workforce in distinct MCM environments.…”
Section: Labour-management Communication Practicesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• If an establishment received a score of less than 15 on the multiple job tasks scale and less than 21 on the decisions type scale; then both variables were coded as follows: HPWSJobDesign received a score of '0' and THRMSJobDesign was assigned a score of '0'. (Arthur 1992;Way 2002;Yount et al 1996;Becker and Huselid 1998;Kintana 2006). This study differs from previous HR research in that it develops two separate HR system indices that represent different approaches in managing the workforce in distinct MCM environments.…”
Section: Labour-management Communication Practicesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We created a comprehensive instrument to measure mass customisation operational performance by combining several items from existing scales that measure cost, quality, delivery and flexibility performance from five existing instruments into one aggregate scale. This aggregate scale was created by theoretically selecting the most representative items from the operational performance instruments in the manufacturing management literature developed by Ahmad and Schroeder (2003), Kintana, Alonso, and Olaverri (2006), Yount et al (1996), Duray (1997),…”
Section: Dependent Variable: Operational Performance Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 These tests indicate that the impacts of HPWSs differ across firm types. For example, Kintana, Alonso and Olaverri (2006), using Spanish data, find that HPWSs are effective for R. Fabling and A. Grimes 490 firms with high technological intensity (e.g., high rates of research and development) but not directly for firms with advanced production technology (high-technology machines). However there is an interaction between the two in that HPWSs are especially effective in high technology intensity firms that have advanced production technology.…”
Section: Hpwss and Firm Performance: Prior Evidence And Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although organisational performance may be lower, due to the application of the cost strategy, financial performance may be higher, due to the fact that financial performance is a 'reduced form variable' of profits minus costs (Kintana, Alonso, & Verri, 2003).…”
Section: Aa Katoumentioning
confidence: 99%