2021
DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2021.1894213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High performance work systems and innovation in New Zealand SMEs: testing firm size and competitive environment effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
79
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
7
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analyses also showed that medium-sized firms had managers most likely to be burnt-out, which might reflect larger firms having more advanced HR practices (see Haar et al, 2021), and, thus, managers in these firms might be especially stretched. As with managerial position, this highlights the complexity of management and argues for greater delineation when assessing burnt-out rates as we did here (by position and firm size).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our analyses also showed that medium-sized firms had managers most likely to be burnt-out, which might reflect larger firms having more advanced HR practices (see Haar et al, 2021), and, thus, managers in these firms might be especially stretched. As with managerial position, this highlights the complexity of management and argues for greater delineation when assessing burnt-out rates as we did here (by position and firm size).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…This is because larger-sized firms are likely to have more significant resources and might provide better human resource practices (see Haar et al, 2021). However, larger-sized firms are also likely to face greater competition (Haar et al, 2021), thus creating tremendous pressure on managers. Again, we expect managers are reporting being burnt-out to differ across different sized firms.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…La primera, denominada «la teoría de recursos y capacidades», en la que se considera a los individuos como activos que pueden convertirse en fuente de ventaja competitiva al ser gestionados por medio de PAR, puesto que los conocimientos y las habilidades que desarrollan contribuyen a que se conviertan en valiosos, raros, difícilmente imitables y apropiables por la organización (Barney, 1991;Wong y Gao, 2014). La segunda, conocida como «enfoque AMO» -por sus siglas en inglés, ability, motivation, opportunity-, sugiere que las PAR conducen a la selección de una fuerza laboral con habilidades superiores, en la cual las oportunidades de capacitación más sólidas darán como resultado una mayor productividad y, de manera similar, las prácticas de compensación apropiadas mejorarán el desempeño a través de una mayor motivación (Haar et al, 2021).…”
Section: Haar Et Al (2021)unclassified
“…Over the past few years, the field of SHRM has paid attention to two essential research domains. First, how HRM practices help organizations to achieve their performance goals and second, which processes improve HRM-Performance link (Haar et al, 2021). Empirical studies conducted by several researchers (Arthur, 1994;Huselid, 1995;MacDuffie, 1995;Obeidat et al, 2016;Wright et al, 2005) tried to explore the link between HRM practices such as HPWS and organization performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%