2021
DOI: 10.1364/ome.437900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High performance SERS platforms via parametric optimization of the laser-assisted photodeposition of silver and gold nanoparticles

Abstract: Parametric optimization of the laser-assisted photocatalytic growth of Ag and Au nanoparticles for high SERS enhancement factor performance informed by design of experiment is demonstrated. The photodeposition process was divided into two phases –seeding and growth– in order to achieve the highest possible nanoparticle surface coverage for the size range from 10 to 100 nm. A substantial difference in the parameter effects between the Ag and Au seeding and growth was found. The SERS performance of the photodepo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 84 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Underestimating (overestimating) NSERS hinders the realistic evaluation of the EF resulting in exceedingly large (low) values and impeding comparability and reproducibility, as we discussed in previous work [9]. One-to-one comparison is made possible if the same molecule and surface density are used in the evaluation of NSERS [10,11]. However, there is no common practice in the evaluation of the substrate performance and, as stressed by a recent editorial [12], selecting standard analytes would be a relevant contribution of metrology to support the standardization process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underestimating (overestimating) NSERS hinders the realistic evaluation of the EF resulting in exceedingly large (low) values and impeding comparability and reproducibility, as we discussed in previous work [9]. One-to-one comparison is made possible if the same molecule and surface density are used in the evaluation of NSERS [10,11]. However, there is no common practice in the evaluation of the substrate performance and, as stressed by a recent editorial [12], selecting standard analytes would be a relevant contribution of metrology to support the standardization process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%