2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.01.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High performance resorbable composites for load-bearing bone fixation devices

Abstract: Bone fractures are some of the most common injuries annually, and many require a fixation device to help properly heal. The present study focuses on developing a bioresorbable composite that has high strength and stiffness for bone fixation applications. To achieve this, a design of experiments was performed, testing the effect of long fiber reinforcement type, matrix type, matrix amount, and particle reinforcement amount on the flexural properties of the composite. Based on these results, the ideal resorbable… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lower values have been reported for titanium (Ti) and its light alloys, such as Ti-6Al-4V ELI, which are also widely used for making implant devices, having a value of around 110 GPa [ 57 ]. As shown above, in comparison to metal alloys, the elasticity of the P(3HB- co -3HHx)/nHA composites prepared in this study is nearer to that of the natural bone, which is in the 8–25 GPa range [ 5 ]. Thus, from a mechanical point of view, their use in bone scaffolds and resorbable plates or screws looks promising.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lower values have been reported for titanium (Ti) and its light alloys, such as Ti-6Al-4V ELI, which are also widely used for making implant devices, having a value of around 110 GPa [ 57 ]. As shown above, in comparison to metal alloys, the elasticity of the P(3HB- co -3HHx)/nHA composites prepared in this study is nearer to that of the natural bone, which is in the 8–25 GPa range [ 5 ]. Thus, from a mechanical point of view, their use in bone scaffolds and resorbable plates or screws looks promising.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, they prevent the bone from being subjected to the required mechanical loadings [ 4 ]. Indeed, while natural bone has a modulus ranging between 8 to 25 GPa, metals have a modulus of 110–210 GPa, which results in the load being imparted onto the device rather than the bone which then causes a localized decrease in bone mineral density [ 5 ]. Meanwhile, metal ion leaching increases inflammation and irritation around the implant [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to scaffold-based applications for bone regeneration, silk/HAP/polylactic acid composites were developed for the fabrication of high strength bioresorbable fixation devices for clinical applications in orthopedics (Heimbach et al, 2018 ). Bioactive glass NPs have been also used in bone tissue engineering using silk-based materials.…”
Section: Silk-based Bionanocompositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12] introduced biomimetic composites for orthopedic applications which used biodegradable polymers blended with β-tricalcium phosphate (TCP), hydroxyapatite (HA), or bioactive glass. Although the addition of these bioceramics improved the biological properties of the composites, including osteoconductivity [4,13] and/or osteoinductivity [10,14], the relatively low overall mechanical strength and modulus still resulted in unsatisfactory healing, particularly when used for load-bearing orthopedic applications [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poly- D, L -lactide (PDLLA) materials with high mechanical performance have been reported to degrade after approximately 1–1.5 years, in comparison with the much longer degradation rate of 5–6 years for conventional poly- L -lactide (PLLA) [21]. The degradation behavior and bioactivity of implants may also be affected by other factors [1,5,15,22] such as the use of long fiber reinforcement [1,22] and the degradation environment [5]. However, little information is available on the mode of degradation and the bioactivity of such novel biocomposites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%