2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High performance prediction of soil compaction parameters using multi expression programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean and standard deviation for MoPesm and laboratory tests were similar. MoPesm predictions had a MAPE of 2,57%, a RMSE of 0,585, a R of 0,873, and a R 2 of 0,763, a very acceptable performance according to Wang and Yin (2020), to whom a high R 2 and low MAPE and RMSE indicate that a model has a higher precision, and to Karimpour-Fard et al (2019), who considered a R 2 above 0,70 as acceptable, labeling such model as "strong".…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mean and standard deviation for MoPesm and laboratory tests were similar. MoPesm predictions had a MAPE of 2,57%, a RMSE of 0,585, a R of 0,873, and a R 2 of 0,763, a very acceptable performance according to Wang and Yin (2020), to whom a high R 2 and low MAPE and RMSE indicate that a model has a higher precision, and to Karimpour-Fard et al (2019), who considered a R 2 above 0,70 as acceptable, labeling such model as "strong".…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that the variation between experimental and predicted data was within a confidence interval of ± 2,5% for γ d, max and ± 9,5% for OMC. Wang and Yin (2020) developed a model using multi expression programming (MEP), a method of genetic programming, and data comprising a wide range of soil types from previously published studies. Their model was considered reliable (R 2 >0,85), even for high-plasticity and coarse-grained soils, which did not figure among the soil types analyzed in previous studies; and, although their results were extremely favorable, the required high-end computational tools somewhat lost track of the simplicity present in other models, which yielded as fair predictions and could make a difference in the face of time constraints and the unavailability of a more complex software apparatus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated earlier, the MEP approach is among the most significant linear configurations of the genetic programming (GP) series since it has the ability to deliver simplistic mathematical formulae to forecast a particular prediction model [ 35 , 41 ]. Therefore, the formulization of the UCS kaolin and UCS BC soil was performed in the Multi-Expression Programming X (MEPX version 2021.08.28.0-beta) by incorporating experimental records, as shown in Table 3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the governing parameters in MEP include subpopulation size and number, code length, function set, and crossover probability. Recently, this approach has gained greater applications in the geotechnical engineering field for addressing varied problems which include the prediction of compaction characteristics [ 34 , 35 ], compressive strengths [ 36 , 37 ], permeability and compressibility characteristics [ 38 ], deformation modulus [ 39 ], soil water characteristic curves, and peak ground acceleration [ 40 ]. However, attempts to generate models for the prediction of geotechnical characteristics of the contaminated soils are scarce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But even so, the consistency parameter PL is a more important factor as well as the gradational one F c among the compaction parameters (MDD and OWC except for ODS) of soils. Recently, although Wang and Yin (2020) recommend highly the proposed equations of Nagaraj et al (2015) as the prediction models for MDD and OWC in the literature (see Seqs. 4 and 10 in Tables 2 and 3, respectively), judging from the results of this study with an extended range of index properties in Figs.…”
Section: Volcanic Cohesive Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%