2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-57058-3_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Performance Offline Handwritten Chinese Text Recognition with a New Data Preprocessing and Augmentation Pipeline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the experiment, we compared our method against four well know offline handwriting text recognition methods [8,9,11,12,14,17]. These methods involve text recognition technologies such as traditional character over-segmentation, CNN and CNN-LSTM, and they have all shown their advantages in their respective aspects.…”
Section: A Experimental Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the experiment, we compared our method against four well know offline handwriting text recognition methods [8,9,11,12,14,17]. These methods involve text recognition technologies such as traditional character over-segmentation, CNN and CNN-LSTM, and they have all shown their advantages in their respective aspects.…”
Section: A Experimental Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Levenstein edit distance [41] is used to measure the performance of the model on character level, and through the length of the label sequence to achieve normalization, which is commonly known as Character Error Rate (CER). In this paper, based on the literature [7,9,12,14], the accurate rate (AR) and correct rate (CR) are employed to evaluate our model. Their formal expressions are as follows:…”
Section: A Experimental Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Handwritten Chinese text recognition (HCTR) has been studied for decades (Graves et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2012;Zhou et al, 2013;Keysers et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2018). However, most previous studies (Yin et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2012Wang et al, , 2016Peng et al, 2019;Su et al, 2009;Du et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2018Wang et al, , 2020aMessina and Louradour, 2015;Xie et al, 2020;Xiu et al, 2019;Xie et al, 2019b;Wang et al, 2020b;Zhu et al, 2020;Luo et al, 2021;Rodriguez-Serrano et al, 2015;Jaderberg et al, 2016) assume that text line detection is provided by annotations and only focus on the recognition of cropped text line images. Although the accuracy of these line-level methods seems to be sufficient when combined with language models, they are limited to the one-dimensional distribution of characters and are significantly affected by the accuracy of text line detection in real-world applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Messina et al [3] proposed multidimensional long-short term memory recurrent neural networks (MDLSTM-RNN) using Connectionist Temporal Classifier [4](CTC) as loss function for end-to-end text line recognition. Xie et al [5] proposed a CNN-ResLSTM model with a data preprocessing and augmentation pipeline to rectify the text pictures to optimize recognition. Xiao et al [6] proposed a deep network with Pixel-Level Rectification to integrate pixel-level rectification into CNN and RNN-based recognizers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%