1995
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620382010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High‐performance multilevel iterative aggregation solver for large finite‐element structural analysis problems

Abstract: SUMMARYThe present study is aimed to overcome difficulties faced with industrial applications of multilevel iterative methods to arbitrary finite element (FE) structural analysis problems. The coarse grid concept, used in multigrid methods, is substituted with an aggregation coarse model based on the mechanical principle. On the base of this approach together with previously developed multilevel preconditioner, an efficient iterative equation solver FELAGS was developed for using in standard comprehensive fini… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…227 (80) 221 (78) 337 (128 (5) ) 660 (308 (6) ) * (6) The incomplete factorization applies to the midside node domain only; a complete factorization of the vertex node domain was used in all cases. The number of factoring failures due to negative pivots, if any, is given in parentheses beside the number of iterations An interesting feature of the graphs is that they each have a hump in the vicinity of = 10 −2 , resulting from an excessive number of factoring failures occurring with this drop tolerance.…”
Section: Results For the Larger Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…227 (80) 221 (78) 337 (128 (5) ) 660 (308 (6) ) * (6) The incomplete factorization applies to the midside node domain only; a complete factorization of the vertex node domain was used in all cases. The number of factoring failures due to negative pivots, if any, is given in parentheses beside the number of iterations An interesting feature of the graphs is that they each have a hump in the vicinity of = 10 −2 , resulting from an excessive number of factoring failures occurring with this drop tolerance.…”
Section: Results For the Larger Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fine grid and the coarse grid in the aggregate are determined in Equation (4). CG with the approximated SC (singlelevel preconditioner) for the SC system is utilized in comparison with Bi-CG with the proposed two-level preconditioner.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Poisson operators consider here this is simply the constant vector (eg, a vector of all ones). Many plane aggregation methods have been developed [9,14,15]. Aggregation methods, as the name implies, aggregate nodes and then inject the kernel vectors onto these nodes sets resulting in piecewise constant coarse grid space functions.…”
Section: Smoothed Aggregation Multigridmentioning
confidence: 99%