2021
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c08924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Performance Multifunctional Carbon–Silicon Carbide Composites with Strengthened Reduced Graphene Oxide

Abstract: Materials with low density, exceptional thermal and corrosion resistance, and ultrahigh mechanical and electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding performance are urgently demanded for aerospace and military industries. Efficient design of materials’ components and microstructures is crucial yet remains highly challenging for achieving the above requirements. Herein, a strengthened reduced graphene oxide (SrGO)-reinforced multi-interfacial carbon–silicon carbide (C-SiC) n matrix (SrGO/(C-SiC) n ) composite i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EMI SE of our VACNT@GP/PDMS composite is compared with the values reported in previous studies in Figure e. Obviously, the SE value of the VACNT@GP/PDMS composites is 75.4–106.7 dB with a thickness ranging from 150 to 560 μm, which is much higher than those of other shielding materials at a similar thickness (100–3000 μm), including graphene-, ,, CNT-, ,, MXene-, cellulous-, carbon fiber-, metal-, and ceramic-based materials (the details are provided in Table S1). In addition, EMI SE/ t is usually normalized to eliminate the influence of thickness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The EMI SE of our VACNT@GP/PDMS composite is compared with the values reported in previous studies in Figure e. Obviously, the SE value of the VACNT@GP/PDMS composites is 75.4–106.7 dB with a thickness ranging from 150 to 560 μm, which is much higher than those of other shielding materials at a similar thickness (100–3000 μm), including graphene-, ,, CNT-, ,, MXene-, cellulous-, carbon fiber-, metal-, and ceramic-based materials (the details are provided in Table S1). In addition, EMI SE/ t is usually normalized to eliminate the influence of thickness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…At present, research on porous carbon-based EMI materials mainly focuses on nanocarbon porous materials, polymeric foam-derived carbon foams, and biomass-derived porous carbon blocks. , Especially, carbon-based films, mats, foams, and aerogels derived from nanocarbon materials possess exceptional electrical conductivities and were considered as promising EMI-shielding materials. , Liu et al assembled MXene sheets into films, followed by a hydrazine-induced foaming process to form a porous structure to improve the multiple reflection and absorption effects of incident EM waves. The maximum EMI shielding efficiency (SE) value of the MXene film reached 70 dB in the X band .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been developed from thermal insulators to electrodes for capacitive deionization, energy storage, moisture-enabled electric generators (MEG), and moisture/mechanical sensors. [1][2][3][4][5] Although different aerogels have been constructed through traditional freeze-drying, supercritical drying, and ambient pressure-drying, [6] they still face a challenge to dry at ambient conditions and achieve high performance with a shrinkage below 10%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%