2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2008.03.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-performance liquid chromatography accelerator mass spectrometry: Correcting for losses during analysis by internal standardization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Resolution of compounds for AMS analysis relies entirely upon the chromatographic separation, which may demand, for example, two-dimensional HPLC, to be confident of complete separation of a target analyte from a mixture where other unknown interfering compounds could be present [40]. In addition, AMS analysis involves a degree of sample processing to form graphite after chromatographic separation, which also demands the accurate addition of an isotopic dilutor [41]. This coupled to the limited number of suitable AMS instruments, with GlaxoSmithKline being the only pharmaceutical company currently with its own AMS facility [42] and LC-MS can often be a winning pragmatic choice.…”
Section: Analytical Methods Associated With Microdosingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resolution of compounds for AMS analysis relies entirely upon the chromatographic separation, which may demand, for example, two-dimensional HPLC, to be confident of complete separation of a target analyte from a mixture where other unknown interfering compounds could be present [40]. In addition, AMS analysis involves a degree of sample processing to form graphite after chromatographic separation, which also demands the accurate addition of an isotopic dilutor [41]. This coupled to the limited number of suitable AMS instruments, with GlaxoSmithKline being the only pharmaceutical company currently with its own AMS facility [42] and LC-MS can often be a winning pragmatic choice.…”
Section: Analytical Methods Associated With Microdosingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the oral dose, blood samples were obtained prior to dosing (0 hours, predose) and at 0.5, 0.75, 1,2,3,4,6,8,12,16,24,48,72,96,120,144, and 168 hours postdose. For the IV dose, blood samples were obtained prior to dosing (0 hours, predose), at 15 minutes (infusion midpoint) and 30 minutes (end of infusion), and then at 35 minutes, 40 minutes, 45 minutes, and 1, 1.5, 2, 3,4,6,8,12,16,24,48,72,96,120,144, and 168 hours after the start of infusion. Blood samples were collected into Vacutainer tubes containing sodium heparin as anticoagulant at the time points specified above.…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 The concentration of [ 14 C]-related species in each sample was determined by way of a calibration curve. 8 The x-axis ranged from 0.0135 to 12.6288 dpm/mL for IDX899 and from 0.0144 to 14.2029 dpm/mL for IDX989. The lower limit of quantitation taken at the lowest standard in the calibration curve was equivalent to 0.0059 ng/mL for IDX899 and 0.0067 ng/mL for IDX989, respectively.…”
Section: Sample Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This amount is too small to affect the isotopic ratio of the composite sample (as the sample mass is 1 mg). The recovery of the analyte in the protein precipitation step was evaluated by integrating the peak area of the added unlabeled remoxiprid from the HPLC UV detector output over the elution time 14. The values were compared with three aqueous standard solutions of remoxiprid ranging from 0.5 to 2 µM and the recovery was determined.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%