High Performance Liquid Chromatographic Determination of <i>d</i>-Phenothrin (Sumithrin®) in Shampoo

Sakaue, Shigeyuki; Kitajima, Megumi; Doi, Tadashi

doi:10.1080/00021369.1985.10867164

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The values in the studies have varied from sample to sample. [12,13]. The recovery value for promecarb is slightly lower than the literature.…”

Section: Accuracymentioning

confidence: 56%

“…Numerous analytical methods for determining penconazole, promecarb and phenothrin residues in various matrix have been published. Analyses of pesticides have been based on chromatographic and spectroscopic methods [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Before penconazole, promecarb and phenothrin residues were determined, samples required sample preaperation part (extraction and purification) [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Analytical Method Development and Validation of Phenothrin, Promecarb and Penconazole in Tobacco using Liquid Extraction and Gas Chromatography

Canbay

2018

Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A sensitive method for the determination of phenothrin, promecarb and penconazole residues in tobacco has been developed. Several solvents such as, hexane, ethyl acetate and dichloromethane were tested in order to minimize agricultural products residue. In the study, the best recovery was achieved with dichloromethane. Pesticides residues are extracted from the samples with dichloromethane. Additional clean-up steps are not required for tobacco matrices. Determination and quantification of phenothrin, promecarb and penconazole are performed by gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC/FID) and gas chromatography-nitrogen/phosphorus (GC/NPD). The method has been validated for tobacco matrices. Under the optimum conditions, phenothrin R 2 value 0.999, promecarb R 2 value 0.999, and penconazole R 2 value 0.999. Limits of determination were 0.008 µg mL-1 for phenothrin, 0.011 µg mL-1 for penconazole and 0.007 µg mL-1 for promecarb. The standard deviations (SDs) levels were in the range 0.01-0.20. Recoveries of phenothrin, promecarb and penconazole from tobacco were found to be higher than 85%. Under this developed method, the concentrations of phenothrin, promecarb and penconazole in the 10 tobacco samples were below the LOD values.

show abstract

“…The values in the studies have varied from sample to sample. [12,13]. The recovery value for promecarb is slightly lower than the literature.…”

Section: Accuracymentioning

confidence: 56%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analytical Method Development and Validation of Phenothrin, Promecarb and Penconazole in Tobacco using Liquid Extraction and Gas Chromatography

Canbay

2018

Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

High Performance Liquid Chromatographic Determination of d-Phenothrin (Sumithrin®) in Shampoo

Cited by 1 publication

References 3 publications

Analytical Method Development and Validation of Phenothrin, Promecarb and Penconazole in Tobacco using Liquid Extraction and Gas Chromatography

Analytical Method Development and Validation of Phenothrin, Promecarb and Penconazole in Tobacco using Liquid Extraction and Gas Chromatography

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About