2016
DOI: 10.1002/advs.201500318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Performance Field Emitters

Abstract: The field electron emission performance of bulk, 1D, and 2D nanomaterials is here empirically compared in the largest metal‐analysis of its type. No clear trends are noted between the turn‐on electric field and maximum current density as a function of emitter work function, while a more pronounced correlation with the emitters dimensionality is noted. The turn‐on field is found to be twice as large for bulk materials compared to 1D and 2D materials, empirically confirming the wider communities view that high a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 164 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in this case, the EF strength decreases at the nanotubes tips because their screening by neighboring closely located CNTs should be taken into account. In a number of researches, dependence of the CNT emission current on amplification factor of the EF strength at their tips β = E max /E 0 was studied [3][4][5][6]. However, the data of various authors on the quantitative dependences of the CNTs characteristics on their parameters do not always coincide [20].…”
Section: Calculation Of Degree Of the Ef Strength Amplification At Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in this case, the EF strength decreases at the nanotubes tips because their screening by neighboring closely located CNTs should be taken into account. In a number of researches, dependence of the CNT emission current on amplification factor of the EF strength at their tips β = E max /E 0 was studied [3][4][5][6]. However, the data of various authors on the quantitative dependences of the CNTs characteristics on their parameters do not always coincide [20].…”
Section: Calculation Of Degree Of the Ef Strength Amplification At Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another area of such problems' application is the emission devices using arrays of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [3][4][5]. According to [6], the problem of determination of the EF strength amplification at the tips of the CNT array: β = E max /E 0 (where E max is maximum EF strength at the rods tips, and E 0 is the average applied EF strength), depending on their parameters, is not completely solved despite that it has been considered in many researches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field-emission (FE) cold cathodes are an outstanding candidate for the replacement of incumbent thermionic electron sources in THz VEDs. FE sources readily overcome many of the inherent limitations associated with traditional thermionic devices, including their slow temporal response and high temperature operation [11][12][13][14]. Meanwhile, the gap between the emitter and the HF system will be dramatically shortened in a cold cathode electron optical system, thereby relaxing design difficulties associated with the need for precise alignment of the beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16][17][18][19] As a static electron emission source, CNTs have been shown to outperform metal tips across almost all quantifiable metrics. [20] In this work, for the first time, we demonstrate an ultrafast carbon nanotube-based, subnanometer electron source. The extremely sharp tips, coupled to their structural stability allow for extremely high optical field localization, thereby enabling access to the field-driven photoemission regime at unprecedentedly short wavelengths as low as 410 nm, compared to 800-3000 nm as conventionally used for metallic tips.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%