“…The SEM images (Figure S2) demonstrated that Cu 0.8 Zn 0.2 (OH)(T140) and Cu 0.8 Zn 0.2 (OH)(T140-R150) were still in the nanosheet structure, suggesting that the morphology of the catalysts was not changed with the thermal treatment with acetylene followed by H 2 hydrogenation. In the XRD pattern of Cu 0.8 Zn 0.2 (OH)(T140-R150) (Figure ), apart from the intense peaks at 2θ = 43.3, 50.4, and 74.1°, which were ascribed to the (111), (200), and (220) planes of metal Cu (PDF 04-0836), respectively, the peak at 2θ = 37.2° was identical to that of the Cu x C crystal. − In addition, the intensity of the diffraction peaks attributed to Cu x C and Cu in Cu(OH) 2 (T140-R150) was higher than that of Cu 0.8 Zn 0.2 (OH)(T140-R150), indicating that the addition of Zn promoted the formation of the smaller crystalline size of Cu x C and Cu (Table S1), probably due to the decreased size and enhanced dispersion of Cu(OH) 2 . Meanwhile, three kinds of crystallites were observed in the HRTEM image of Cu 0.8 Zn 0.2 (OH)(T140-R150) (Figure ).…”