2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c01002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Performance and Broadband Flexible Photodetectors Employing Multicomponent Alloyed 1D CdSxSe1–x Micro-Nanostructures

Abstract: Low-cost multicomponent alloyed one-dimensional (1D) semiconductors exhibit broadband absorption from the ultraviolet to the near-infrared regime, which has attracted a great deal of interest in high-performance flexible optoelectronic devices. Here, we report the facile one-step fabrication of high-performance broadband rigid and flexible photodevices based on multicomponent alloyed 1D cadmium–sulfur–selenide (CdS x Se1–x ) micro-nanostructures obtained via a vapor transport route. Photoresponse measurements … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon can be attributed to the smaller bandgap of bare CdSe ( E g = 1.74 eV) as compared to the bandgap of pristine PbI 2 ( E g = 2.36 eV), thus the photoresponse range of the 1D CdSe nanobelt/2D PbI 2 flake hybrid heterojunction photodetector is enlarged marginally and the peak value shows blue shift . This phenomenon is very common and can be seen in previous hybrid heterojunction-based photodetectors. , Notably, the spectral photoresponsivity of the present 1D CdSe nanobelt/2D PbI 2 flake hybrid heterojunction photodetector is several times higher than the individual bare PbI 2 flake and CdSe nanobelt photodetectors, as depicted in Figure a and Figure S4a, b.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This phenomenon can be attributed to the smaller bandgap of bare CdSe ( E g = 1.74 eV) as compared to the bandgap of pristine PbI 2 ( E g = 2.36 eV), thus the photoresponse range of the 1D CdSe nanobelt/2D PbI 2 flake hybrid heterojunction photodetector is enlarged marginally and the peak value shows blue shift . This phenomenon is very common and can be seen in previous hybrid heterojunction-based photodetectors. , Notably, the spectral photoresponsivity of the present 1D CdSe nanobelt/2D PbI 2 flake hybrid heterojunction photodetector is several times higher than the individual bare PbI 2 flake and CdSe nanobelt photodetectors, as depicted in Figure a and Figure S4a, b.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…To further clarify the spectral response range variation of the 1D CdSe nanobelt/2D PbI 2 flake heterojunction device, the spectral responsivities of three photodetectors made of bare 2D PbI 2 flake, pristine CdSe nanobelt, and 1D CdSe nanobelt/2D PbI 2 flake heterojunction under varied wavelengths in the range of 200 to 800 nm at an applied bias of 5 V were measured, as depicted in Figure a. The spectral responsivity can be calculated by using the mathematical formula: R = Δ I P S = I photo I dark P S where I photo and I dark are the photo- and dark currents, respectively. The incident illumination power and the uncovered part of the hybrid heterojunction photodetector, which is illuminated by the monochromatic light during the testing procedure, are represented by P and S , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High-performance, photosensing devices based on photoconductive, photovoltaic effects have attracted diverse applications in the field of imaging, optical fiber communication, biosensors, etc. One-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) nanostructure-based photodetectors have acquired increasing interest owing to their superior absorption properties, large surface-to-volume ratio, and enhanced photoresponsivity. , However, traditional photodetectors exhibit a trade-off between superior performance and mechanical stability . Conventionally, flexible photodetectors are majorly developed using polymer substrates or cellulose microfibers (paper).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to electronics on rigid substrates, flexible counterparts show enormously promising advantages, such as mobile‐friendly, bendable, stretchable, low‐cost, as well as seamless heterogeneous integration, which can provide a variety of possibilities for the next‐generation electronic and photoelectric devices with multifunction, flexibility, and miniaturization. [ 11–15 ] For example, ultrathin flexible electrode arrays could be installed on epidermis [ 16 ] or organ surfaces [ 17 ] for real‐time monitoring of human health that cannot be realized by traditional rigid electronic devices. Thus, new functional materials of flexible electronics that not only meet the demand of high performance but also have good stability and durability under reiterative bending, folding, or stretching are urgently pursued.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%