2012
DOI: 10.1155/2012/452910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Performance 3D PET Reconstruction Using Spherical Basis Functions on a Polar Grid

Abstract: Statistical iterative methods are a widely used method of image reconstruction in emission tomography. Traditionally, the image space is modelled as a combination of cubic voxels as a matter of simplicity. After reconstruction, images are routinely filtered to reduce statistical noise at the cost of spatial resolution degradation. An alternative to produce lower noise during reconstruction is to model the image space with spherical basis functions. These basis functions overlap in space producing a significant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study showed that all reconstructions up to four iterations are executed within 30 min and almost all combinations could be executed within an hour. These results are consistent with previous studies [ 13 ]. Therefore, all proposed parameter combinations could be used in a clinical setting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study showed that all reconstructions up to four iterations are executed within 30 min and almost all combinations could be executed within an hour. These results are consistent with previous studies [ 13 ]. Therefore, all proposed parameter combinations could be used in a clinical setting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…However, due to statistical noise, filtering is often required at the expense of reduced contrast and spatial resolution loss. The use of spherically symmetric basis functions (blobs) as opposed to voxels improves upon the former, with the blob-based reconstruction resulting in less image noise, without loss of resolution within a range of basis function parameters [ 10 13 ]. In addition, the smoother, overlaying spatial distribution of blobs will better represent the smoother biological transitions compared to the discontinuous sharp boundaries of voxels [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several papers have focused on new algorithms for image reconstruction, including a sparse matrix approach (Zhou and Qi, 2011), a particle filter approach (Yu et al, 2011a) and a spherical basis approach (Cabello et al, 2012). Image quality can be further improved by including scatter correction in the reconstruction algorithm (Wirth et al, 2009;Barker et al, 2009;Kim and Ye, 2011;Magdics et al, 2011), which adds an additional computational load.…”
Section: Petmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method was validated using simulated and real NEMA 2008 image quality phantoms, Derenzo phantoms and a real Na 22 point source. The results were compared with a specifi commercial histogram-mode OSEM algorithm based on a precalculated system matrix.…”
Section: Iia the Reconstruction Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 When the SM is calculated using MC methods, real measurements, or complex numerical approximations, it must be precomputed and stored off line to keep the reconstruction time low, thus requiring enormous storage space for 3D PET imaging. Size reduction is provided by histogram compression, axial and rotational symmetries, 20,21 polarvoxel symmetries, 22,23 quasi-symmetries, 8 axial mashing, 24 and factorization as a product of sparse matrices. 25 It has been shown that MC calculated SM can be stored in programmable graphic processing units (GPUs), which have typically very limited memory resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%