2007
DOI: 10.1029/2007gl029823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High penetration of ultraviolet radiation in the south east Pacific waters

Abstract: [1] We investigated the penetration of solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) in the surface waters of the south east Pacific (08 -35°S, 142 -73°W) from October to December 2004 during the BIOSOPE cruise. In the hyper-oligotrophic waters of the South Pacific Gyre (near Easter Island), diffuse attenuation coefficients for downward irradiance, K d (l), at 305 nm (UV-B), 325, 340 and 380 nm (UV-A) were 0.083, 0.055, 0.039 and 0.021 m À1 , respectively. The corresponding 10% irradiance depths, Z 10% (l), were 28, 42, 5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
70
2
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(36 reference statements)
6
70
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…UVR penetration is often calculated as the depth of the layer receiving 10% of the light at the surface (Tedetti & Sempéré 2006); this varied from 10 m for UVB (at 305 nm) to 27 m for UVA (at 380 nm), which are important measures when considering that the equivalent 10% layer for PAR corresponded to 34 m. In fact, Tedetti & Sempéré (2006) provided depths of 9 and 16 m receiving the 10% UVBR in the Mediterranean Sea. The transparency in the UVB and UVA bands obtained here for the Mediterranean Sea was equivalent to that reported for other oligotrophic areas, such as the waters around the Marquesas Islands, in the South Pacific (Morel et al 2007, Tedetti et al 2007), but less than that for the clearest oceanic waters, where K d coefficients are half the values reported here (Morel et al 2007, Tedetti et al 2007). Underwater penetration of UVR was transformed in this study to doses received per day, helping to relate the penetration of UV radiation with its potential damage to cyanobacterial populations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…UVR penetration is often calculated as the depth of the layer receiving 10% of the light at the surface (Tedetti & Sempéré 2006); this varied from 10 m for UVB (at 305 nm) to 27 m for UVA (at 380 nm), which are important measures when considering that the equivalent 10% layer for PAR corresponded to 34 m. In fact, Tedetti & Sempéré (2006) provided depths of 9 and 16 m receiving the 10% UVBR in the Mediterranean Sea. The transparency in the UVB and UVA bands obtained here for the Mediterranean Sea was equivalent to that reported for other oligotrophic areas, such as the waters around the Marquesas Islands, in the South Pacific (Morel et al 2007, Tedetti et al 2007), but less than that for the clearest oceanic waters, where K d coefficients are half the values reported here (Morel et al 2007, Tedetti et al 2007). Underwater penetration of UVR was transformed in this study to doses received per day, helping to relate the penetration of UV radiation with its potential damage to cyanobacterial populations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Chlorophyll biomass followed this general trend with very low values in the center of the SPG (0.023 µg l −1 ), with levels reaching 0.3 µg l −1 near the Marquesas Islands and 1 µg l −1 in the Chilean upwelling. The photic layer located at 40-50 m around the Marquesas and upwelling regions deepened in the centre of the SPG, reaching 160 m between 120 • W and 105 • W, which could be expected in the clearest natural waters of the world (Morel et al, 2007;Tedetti et al, 2007). The incident solar radiation was more or less constant during the cruise (41±7 Em −2 s −1 ) with the exception of three very cloudy days (9 to 11 November 2004, e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the clearest waters of the world's ocean (Morel et al, 2007;Tedetti et al, 2007). Nixon (1995) assigned annual rates of carbon fixation of <100, 100 to 300 and 300 to 500 g C m −2 y −1 in oligotrophic, mesotrophic and eutrophic areas, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given our results, we expect that increased UVB radiation due to depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer (SOL) exerts a larger impact on marine primary producers than on freshwater primary producers. The impact on marine primary producers is likely to have been increased by the fact that the oligotrophic ocean, characterized by deep penetration of high UVB doses (Llabrés and Agustí, 2006;Tedetti et al, 2007) encompasses 70% of the surfaces of world's oceans and, thereby, a large fraction of the biosphere. However, ecosystem buffers may include many other factors (such as species-specific resistance, photo-adaptation capacities, nutrient levels, species habit), which were not assessed here, and these may add to the uncertainty in evaluating the impacts of elevated UVB radiation on marine ecosystems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because UVB was believed to be absorbed rapidly in aquatic ecosystems, the impacts of UVB radiation were believed to be stronger on terrestrial photosynthetic organisms than on marine photosynthetic organisms (Rozema et al, 2002). However, UVB penetrates to considerable depths in freshwater and marine ecosystems (Llabrés and Agustí, 2006;Tedetti et al, 2007), thereby impacting marine photosynthetic organisms as well, although the penetration of UVB varies with latitude, season and water turbidity (Hanelt et al, 2001;Wiencke et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%