2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-order time integration applied to metal powder plasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A relatively new single‐surface yield criterion applicable to metal powder compaction as well as granular materials and foams is the model proposed by Bier and Hartmann . The yield function consists of a so‐called log‐log‐interpolation of 2 simple convex yield functions, where an ellipse yield function is combined with an exponential function resulting in a single‐face yield criterion: alignleftalign-1F(I1,J2)align-2=J2+clnexp(f1(I1)/c)+exp(f2(I1)/c)2. The ellipsoidal part f 1 ( I 1 ) and the exponential part f 2 ( I 1 ) of the yield function Ffalse(I1,J2false) are defined as follows: alignleftalign-1f1(I1)align-2=k2α(I13ξ)2withk=α(I03ξ)2, alignleftalign-1f2(I1)align-2=A1A2exp(A3I1...…”
Section: Yielding Behavior Of Cellular Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relatively new single‐surface yield criterion applicable to metal powder compaction as well as granular materials and foams is the model proposed by Bier and Hartmann . The yield function consists of a so‐called log‐log‐interpolation of 2 simple convex yield functions, where an ellipse yield function is combined with an exponential function resulting in a single‐face yield criterion: alignleftalign-1F(I1,J2)align-2=J2+clnexp(f1(I1)/c)+exp(f2(I1)/c)2. The ellipsoidal part f 1 ( I 1 ) and the exponential part f 2 ( I 1 ) of the yield function Ffalse(I1,J2false) are defined as follows: alignleftalign-1f1(I1)align-2=k2α(I13ξ)2withk=α(I03ξ)2, alignleftalign-1f2(I1)align-2=A1A2exp(A3I1...…”
Section: Yielding Behavior Of Cellular Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and stored for the calculation (30) and finally for (27). The coefficients of an SDIRK-method are compiled in the Butcher-tableau, see Table 1.…”
Section: +K(t θ)θ(T)−p θ (T θ) = 0 (23)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The derivation follows the ideas in [13,[26][27][28], where the methods are applied to purely mechanical problems. This procedure has the advantage that backward Euler based finite element implementations are easily extendable to a high-order DIRK-method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), see for different applications [28,30,31]. Thereby, u ∈ R nu are the unknown nodal displacements and q ∈ R nQ the internal variables at all spatial integration points.…”
Section: F(t Y(t)ẏ(t)) := G(t U(t) Q(t)) Q(t) − R(t U(t)u(t) Qmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further problems might occur in constitutive equations with softening behavior. In this case, local integration steps (8) have to be treated with the methods discussed above, see the discussion in [31] for a pressure sensitive viscoplasticity model. A small viscosity is commonly applied to regularize the case distinctions in yield function based models, see the discussion in [54].…”
Section: F(t Y(t)ẏ(t)) := G(t U(t) Q(t)) Q(t) − R(t U(t)u(t) Qmentioning
confidence: 99%