20th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference 2011
DOI: 10.2514/6.2011-3231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High order residual distribution scheme for Navier-Stokes equations

Abstract: In this work we describe the use of the Residual Distribution schemes applied to the discretization of conservation laws. In particular, emphasis is put on the construction of a third order accurate scheme. We first recall the properties of a Residual Distribution scheme and we show how to construct a high order scheme for advection problems. Furthermore, we show how to speed up the convergence of the implicit scheme to the steady solution by the means of the Jacobian-free technique. We then extend the scheme … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We do not consider high-order (curved) elements, e.g., curved P 2 elements, because the third-order scheme considered here relies on a special property of the edgebased scheme that it achieves third-order accuracy on linear triangles, which would probably be lost on curved elements. Compared with other high-order methods, which fail to achieve the design order of accuracy without curved elements such as the discontinuous Galerkin method [27,28] and the continuous finite-element-type methods [29][30][31], the thirdorder scheme considered here does not require boundary conditions imposed over the boundary edge (they are imposed at nodes), nor extra degrees of freedom placed between two boundary nodes, which should be located at the physical boundary and thus makes a curved boundary edge inevitable on a curved boundary. We point out that similar third-order schemes exist that preserve third-order accuracy without curved elements [32,33].…”
Section: Potential Flow Over Curved Boundarymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We do not consider high-order (curved) elements, e.g., curved P 2 elements, because the third-order scheme considered here relies on a special property of the edgebased scheme that it achieves third-order accuracy on linear triangles, which would probably be lost on curved elements. Compared with other high-order methods, which fail to achieve the design order of accuracy without curved elements such as the discontinuous Galerkin method [27,28] and the continuous finite-element-type methods [29][30][31], the thirdorder scheme considered here does not require boundary conditions imposed over the boundary edge (they are imposed at nodes), nor extra degrees of freedom placed between two boundary nodes, which should be located at the physical boundary and thus makes a curved boundary edge inevitable on a curved boundary. We point out that similar third-order schemes exist that preserve third-order accuracy without curved elements [32,33].…”
Section: Potential Flow Over Curved Boundarymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The total residual is first computed without considering the boundary contributions, then a correction residual is added to correctly take into account the boundary conditions. For a node i belonging to the boundary, the residual associated to the boundary conditions can be written as [8] …”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We describe this in the steady 2D case, the extension to the unsteady case or the 1D case is quite straightforward. In our simulation, we have chosen to use the scheme developed in related works, but this is not essential and what matters is that the stencil of the method is relatively compact because we are integrating a PDE of the form…”
Section: Computational Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Representation of the set  i . The vertex M i is indicated with a • and the elements of  i by • related works,[52][53][54] but this is not essential and what matters is that the stencil of the method is relatively compact because we are integrating a PDE of the form(12) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%