2019
DOI: 10.3390/mca24010019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Order Methods Applied to Nonlinear Magnetostatic Problems

Abstract: This paper presents a comparison between two high-order modeling methods for solving magnetostatic problems under magnetic saturation, focused on the extraction of machine parameters. Two formulations are compared, the first is based on the Newton-Raphson approach, and the second successively iterates the local remanent magnetization and the incremental reluctivity of the nonlinear soft-magnetic material. The latter approach is more robust than the Newton-Raphson method, and uncovers useful properties for the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The figure shows that 0.18% absolute error in the attraction force is achieved with N x =120, N y =60, and N h =50. This shows that FPM used in HAM is able to obtain similar accuracy as state-of-the-art high-order methods [16]. On the other hand, it is also observed that analyzing further than that point causes the system of equation to be illconditioned, which leads to numerical errors in the solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The figure shows that 0.18% absolute error in the attraction force is achieved with N x =120, N y =60, and N h =50. This shows that FPM used in HAM is able to obtain similar accuracy as state-of-the-art high-order methods [16]. On the other hand, it is also observed that analyzing further than that point causes the system of equation to be illconditioned, which leads to numerical errors in the solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This is not straightforward for the complex-valued operator [38,39], for which the construction of the Jacobian matrix is cumbersome. Instead, for the complex-valued operator, a fixed-point method (FPM) is often preferred [18,37,40].…”
Section: Harmonic Balance Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To include the effect of the nonlinear constitutive equations, i.e., the nonlinear softmagnetic material B-H characteristics, two methods are usually considered: the fixed-point method (FPM) or the Newton-Raphson method (NRM). A comparison between both nonlinear methods is presented in [18] in the various frameworks of the isogeometric analysis, the finite element method, and the spectral element method. In this paper, the NRM is considered to account for the field dependency of the magnetic permeability ν(x, B), using the Jacobian matrix J.…”
Section: Spatial Discretization Of Nonlinear Magnetic Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in this paper, because of the introduction of the source description using complex position-dependent magnetization, the motional eddy currents can be analyzed. The complex-valued problem derived from the harmonic balance is linearized using the fixed-point method described in [11]. The solution in the time-domain is reconstructed from the computed Fourier coefficients.…”
Section: Modeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%