“…To illustrate this, the mean radon flux is shown versus the peak radon flux for selected sites (Figure ). The mean radon flux of the SBHS appears similar to the mean values observed in other natural sites, such as volcanic [ Voltattorni et al , ], hydrothermal [ Yang et al , ], and mofette sites [ Žunić et al , ; Tuccimei and Soligo , ]. The peak radon flux of the SBHS is 1 and 2 orders of magnitude higher than the peaks measured in those same volcanic, hydrothermal, and mofette sites and in fault‐ and geology‐related sites [ Ielsch et al , ; Ciotoli et al , ; Richon et al , ], respectively, but appears compatible with peaks obtained in some American, Australian, and Chinese uranium mining sites [ Pearson and Jones , ; Bollhöfer et al , ; Mudd , ; Tan et al , ].…”