2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.01.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High magnetoresistance in Co–Fe–B-based double barrier magnetic tunnel junction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. The same results were also observed by other researchers [10,14], which is likely due to subtle differences in the upper and lower metal/oxide interfaces corresponding at each AlOx barrier. It can be clearly seen that the voltage value for which the TMR decreases to half of its maximum value measured at low bias V 1/2 is about 1.06 V, which is almost two times that of the single barrier MTJs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3. The same results were also observed by other researchers [10,14], which is likely due to subtle differences in the upper and lower metal/oxide interfaces corresponding at each AlOx barrier. It can be clearly seen that the voltage value for which the TMR decreases to half of its maximum value measured at low bias V 1/2 is about 1.06 V, which is almost two times that of the single barrier MTJs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…After annealing at 275 1C for an hour, the TMR ratio increased to 51%. This value agrees well with those fabricated by a traditional process [14]. The increase of the TMR ratio after annealing may be attributed to an improvement of the smoothness of the interface between the ferromagnetic/ insulator (FM/I) layers and barrier homogenization as the result of the reduction in the defect density in the Al-oxide barrier.…”
Section: Experimental Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We have repeated the same simulation with 20 nm Cu as the bottom conductive layer instead of Au. Cu is another commonly used bottom electrode in MTJs and it has a resistivity of 1.7x10 -8 ohm m which is even lower than Au [15]. Similar resistance and conductance vs etch depth graphs are obtained in Figures 4c and 4d.…”
Section: Simulationsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Such high value of V 1/2 is desirable for high performance MRAM [6]. An asymmetry of the bias voltage dependence is due to differences in two interfaces between the AlO x barrier layer and two ferromagnetic (top and bottom) electrodes [2,7].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%