1979
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9112/30/12/030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Magnetic Fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, in deference to the above, the calculations were tried out with a range of assumed values somewhat lower, namely at 0; +0.10 and +0.25. These have turned out well in covering the required range, and our position is supported by Eaves' (1973) finding that assortive mating is essential to good fit in the case of intelligence inheritance data.…”
Section: Bases Of the Statistical Analysis: The Oses And Thesupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Nevertheless, in deference to the above, the calculations were tried out with a range of assumed values somewhat lower, namely at 0; +0.10 and +0.25. These have turned out well in covering the required range, and our position is supported by Eaves' (1973) finding that assortive mating is essential to good fit in the case of intelligence inheritance data.…”
Section: Bases Of the Statistical Analysis: The Oses And Thesupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Note that dn/dt is the product of two exponential factors. One is derived from the quasi-equilibrium population of the excited state, and is explicitly displayed in equation 10. The other factor is contained in a = a. exp -Eb/kT and derives from the barrier, Fb, for a multiphonon transition to the DX state.…”
Section: E-)/kt] (11)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2] H however, recent hydrostatic pressure studies, [6][7][8] especially when combined with inf'rared vibrational spectroscopy, [9,10] strongly suggest that D)X is just the simple substittitonal donor. The idea that the simple donor can participate in a large lattice relaxation hlas heen difficult to accept, prompting repeated attempts to explain the D)X level as either an iintisially deep hydrogenic state, [l1-14] or as a deep state [15][16][17][18] of the type proposed by lljalmarson et al [l] With only small lattice relaxation of the donor, all of these models lack a physical mechanism which can explain the immeasurably small radiative capture rate, and the corresponding immeasurably small photoionization cross section at energies on the order of the thermal binding energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%