2008
DOI: 10.1590/s1415-47572008000300007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High levels of chromosomal differentiation in Euchroma gigantea L. 1735 (Coleoptera, Buprestidae)

Abstract: Euchroma gigantea was karyotypically studied using conventional staining, C-banding, silver nitrate staining and ribosomal fluorescent in situ hybridization (rDNA FISH). Broad wide autosomal polymorphism and a complex sex determination system were found in this beetle. Karyotype complements ranging from 2n = 32, X1X2X3Y1Y2Y3 to 2n = 36,X1X2X3Y1Y2Y3 were detected in the sample analyzed. Punctiform supernumerary chromosomes were present in the different karyotypes. The karyotypic evolution of Brazilian E. gigant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, numeric and morphologic variation in chromosomes of different taxa, for example, in families and subfamilies, have been described in the literature. Different structural rearrangements such as Robertsonian rearrangements and in tandem fusions and fissions can be responsible for such variations (Smith and Virkki, 1978;Vidal and Nocera, 1984;Petitpierre et al, 1991;Schneider et al, 2006;Moura et al, 2008;Cabral-de-Mello et al, 2008). The 2 species described herein differed with regard to the diploid number, chromosomal morphology, and sex chromosome bivalent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, numeric and morphologic variation in chromosomes of different taxa, for example, in families and subfamilies, have been described in the literature. Different structural rearrangements such as Robertsonian rearrangements and in tandem fusions and fissions can be responsible for such variations (Smith and Virkki, 1978;Vidal and Nocera, 1984;Petitpierre et al, 1991;Schneider et al, 2006;Moura et al, 2008;Cabral-de-Mello et al, 2008). The 2 species described herein differed with regard to the diploid number, chromosomal morphology, and sex chromosome bivalent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of B chromosomes in Coleoptera has been reported in B80 species, but these studies were focused on the presence or absence of this element, with no description of frequency in populations or in relation to its molecular content (Camacho, 2005;Angus et al, 2007;Moura et al, 2008). In the family Scarabaeidae, the presence of B chromosomes was described in representatives of the Cetoniinae and Scarabaeinae subfamilies .…”
Section: The B Chromosomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among Coleoptera species, the studies reporting the presence of B chromosomes have generally focused on the presence or absence of this element and have not considered their frequency in the population or their molecular content [18,21,23,36]. The presence of B chromosomes was reported in representatives of the Cetoniinae and Scarabaeinae, subfamilies of Scarabaeidae [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Coleoptera, the presence of B chromosomes has been described in approximately 80 species belonging to several families, including Buprestidae [18], Cantharidae [19], Cicindelidae [20] and Scarabaeidae [21,22]. In general, the studies in Coleoptera have concentrated on the presence or absence of B chromosomes in species, with few reports covering their frequency in populations and/or their molecular content [18,21-23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation