Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformation 1999
DOI: 10.1142/9789812814951_0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Level Replacement Systems Applied to Algebraic Specifications and Petri Nets

Abstract: The general idea of high-level replacement systems is to generalize the concept of graph transformation systems and graph grammars from graphs to all kinds of structures which are of interest in Computer Science and Mathematics. Within the algebraic approach of graph transformation this is possible by replacing graphs, graph morphisms, and pushouts (gluing) of graphs by objects, morphisms, and pushouts in a suitable category. Of special interest are categories for all kinds of labelled and typed graphs, hyperg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results do not only hold in graph structure categories, but also in other categories which satisfy certain properties typical for the categories of sets and high-level replacement systems [4]. In this context it is also interesting to point out that most of the categorical properties we need hold already in adhesive categories [12].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Our results do not only hold in graph structure categories, but also in other categories which satisfy certain properties typical for the categories of sets and high-level replacement systems [4]. In this context it is also interesting to point out that most of the categorical properties we need hold already in adhesive categories [12].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Indeed, they are usually assumed as axioms (see [9] and §8 below) in attempts at generalizing graph rewriting. They hold in any adhesive category by Lemma 2.3.…”
Section: S H H H H H H H H H H H H Zmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once such a diagram is constructed we may deduce that C D, that is, C rewrites to D. DPO rewriting is formulated in categorical terms and is therefore portable to structures other than directed graphs. There have been several attempts [9,11] to isolate classes of categories in which one can perform DPO rewriting and in which one can show that such rewriting grammars satisfy useful properties. In particular, several axioms were put forward in [11] in order to prove a local Church-Rosser theorem for such general grammars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations