High isotropic resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the mandibular canal at 1.5 T: a comparison of gradient and spin echo sequences

Abstract

Objectives: The precision of localizing the mandibular canal prior to surgical intervention depends on the achievable resolution, whereas identification of the nerve depends on the image contrast. In our study, we developed new protocols based on gradient and spin echo sequences. The results from both sequences were quantitatively compared for their agreement to identify the most suitable approach. Methods: By limiting the field of view to one side of the mandible, three-dimensional acquisitions with T 1 weighted gradient and spin echo sequences were performed with 0.5 3 0.5 3 0.5 mm 3 resolution within 6.5 min covering the mandibular canal from the mandibular to the mental foramen. Aliasing artefacts were suppressed by different techniques. A manual segmentation of the mandibular canal from seven healthy volunteers was performed on this section by three different observers. The surface distance of the segmented volumes was computed between both sequences as well as between the different observers as a measure of equality. Results: The quantitative comparison of the segmentation resulted in an average surface distance of 0.26 ± 0.05 mm between both sequences and an interobserver difference of 0.26 ± 0.08 mm for gradient and 0.29 ± 0.07 mm for spin echo data. By repeated evaluation, a difference of 0.15 ± 0.02 mm for gradient and 0.18 ± 0.03 mm for spin echo data was observed, indicating a slightly higher variability for spin echo images. Conclusions: Both sequences can be used to achieve high-resolution images with good contrast and can be used for precise localization of the mandibular canal. Despite a slightly increased difference for the spin echo data, the advantage of an easy and robust setup remains. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2017Radiology ( ) 46, 20160268. doi: 10.1259 Cite this article as: Kreutner J, Hopfgartner A, Weber D, Boldt J, Rottner K, Richter E, et al. High isotropic resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the mandibular canal at 1.5 T: a comparison of gradient and spin echo sequences.

Virtual implant planning and fully guided implant surgery using magnetic resonance imaging—Proof of principle

“…More recent studies showed an accurate and high‐resolution display of the inferior alveolar nerve and intraoral anatomy within clinically feasible scanning times using specific surface coils and the interference of dental implants and inferior alveolar nerve using MRI (Flügge et al, 2016; Gradl et al, 2017; Kreutner et al, 2017; Wanner et al, 2018).…”

Is MRI a viable alternative to CT/CBCT to identify the course of the inferior alveolar nerve in relation to the roots of the third molars?

“…However, one should keep in mind that the "misjudgment" might actually not necessarily occur when judging the MRI images. In fact, MRI is the most commonly used technique to directly visualize the IAN [22] and to precisely localize the IAN including pathologic processes [9,[44][45][46].…”

Mandibular canal visibility using a plain volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination sequence in MRI

“…In most studies, a VIBE sequence has been used to depict NVBs. [12][13][14] Several studies employed spin echo sequences, 15,16 but they have not more effectively depicted NVBs. Hence, in some cases, a clinician must potentially remove the metals causing a metallic artefact owing to the clinical requirements for identifying the MC.…”