2012
DOI: 10.1002/mop.27279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High‐isolation 2.4/5.2/5.8 GHz WLAN MIMO antenna array for laptop computer application

Abstract: An isolation technique for two small‐size triband wireless wide area network (WLAN) multiple‐input multiple‐output (MIMO) laptop computer antennas covering the 2.4/5.2/5.8 GHz bands is presented. The proposed WLAN MIMO antennas have measured isolation of better than −21 dB in the 2.4 GHz band and −32 dB in the 5.2/5.8 GHz bands in this study. In addition to enhanced isolation achieved, good antenna efficiencies of better than about 70 and 90%, respectively, in the 2.4 GHz and 5.2/5.8 GHz bands are obtained for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The available space for antennas, however, is very limited and the port-to-port isolation of antennas will get worse while the distance in-between antennas will get closer. In consideration of the demands of isolation improvement, some methods have been reported, including an embedded slit inserted in the ground plan between two antennas [1], a parasitic strip as a wavetrap for isolation improvement [2], the use of neutralization line for 2.4 GHz single band [3,4], and so on. The proposed antenna consists of two coupled-fed PIFAs which are located on the opposite corners of FR4 substrate as a system circuit board and separated by a small protruded ground portion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The available space for antennas, however, is very limited and the port-to-port isolation of antennas will get worse while the distance in-between antennas will get closer. In consideration of the demands of isolation improvement, some methods have been reported, including an embedded slit inserted in the ground plan between two antennas [1], a parasitic strip as a wavetrap for isolation improvement [2], the use of neutralization line for 2.4 GHz single band [3,4], and so on. The proposed antenna consists of two coupled-fed PIFAs which are located on the opposite corners of FR4 substrate as a system circuit board and separated by a small protruded ground portion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though [3] has shown a small size of 16 3 5.2 3 0.8 mm 3 , it must stand vertically on the no-ground zone of the system ground. For brevity, other WLAN antenna designs with small size reported in the open-literature [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] will not be further discussed, but their planar sizes and occupied surfaces area are shown in Table I. By observing this table, the smallest WLAN antenna designed at the moment was [9], which has a planar size of 10 3 10 mm 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also noted that in order to have an attractive appearance of the metal casing, the open slot embedded therein should be simple and narrow in its structure, which makes it a design challenge to achieve multiband operation for the antenna to meet practical applications. In this study, a multiband open‐slot antenna with a sticker‐like feed substrate for the GPS (global positioning system) operation at 1.575 GHz and WLAN (wireless wide area network) operation in the 2.4 GHz (2400–2484 MHz), 5.2 GHz (5150–5350 MHz), and 5.8 GHz (5725–5875 MHz) bands is presented for the metal‐casing smartphone application. The sticker‐like feed substrate in this study is a 0.4‐mm‐thick FR4 substrate with the microstrip feedline and circuit elements disposed thereon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%