2020
DOI: 10.1111/sms.13861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High‐intensity exercise to improve cardiorespiratory fitness in cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: Cancer remains a global public health problem despite considerable advances in prevention, treatment, and aftercare strategies. Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States, with ~1.7 million new cases diagnosed in 2019, more than 4800 each day. 1 Cancer patients often have to pass through different treatments (surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormone therapy, etc) which affects their health, activities of daily living, 2 and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRFit). CRFit measures are clinica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
1
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the instances when RPE was used, the intensity was gauged to be at the optimal level when RPE was between 16-18/20. Results demonstrated a significant improvement of normalV˙normalO2 peak in the HIIT groups when compared with the inactive groups 10. However, when HIIT was compared with active control groups (low to moderate or moderate-intensity exercise), there was no significant difference found.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the instances when RPE was used, the intensity was gauged to be at the optimal level when RPE was between 16-18/20. Results demonstrated a significant improvement of normalV˙normalO2 peak in the HIIT groups when compared with the inactive groups 10. However, when HIIT was compared with active control groups (low to moderate or moderate-intensity exercise), there was no significant difference found.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…With respect to the optimal duration and timing of sessions, interventions that were at least 8 weeks in length demonstrated greater improvement in normalV˙normalO2 peak than sessions less than 8 weeks in length. Sessions that included at least 20 minutes of HIIT or more demonstrated greater improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness than sessions that were less than 20 minutes in length 10. It should be noted that the majority of studies included in this systematic review and meta-analysis also included other components such as resistance training, stretching, or breathing exercises.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) have more than 20 minutes of high intensity exercise in each session of aerobic training interventions, (ii) started to exercise prior to the treatment, and (iii) exercised for > 8 weeks in duration. 127 In terms of lung fibrosis and inflammation, 4 weeks of moderate intensity (60minutes, 5 times per week) treadmill running improved lung and systemic inflammation, but it did not inhibit bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis and remodeling in an animal study. 128 Others, however, have observed also accelerated resolution of lung fibrosis (reduced collagen fiber depositions) following 4-week exercise training in mice with bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis.…”
Section: Exercise and Bleomycin-induced Pulmonary Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A similar workto-rest ratio has been administrated in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. 37…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%