2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High intensity aerobic exercise does not prime the brain for anodal transcranial direct current stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the non-significant effects of a-tDCS and highintensity interval exercise on motor learning were unexpected in the current study, it is notable that two recent studies investigating the combination of a-tDCS and aerobic exercise on executive functions also reported no significant benefit on cognitive performance (Hendy et al, 2019;Thomas et al, 2020). While these studies had differences in protocol, including difference in cognitive tasks and stimulated regions, making them not directly comparable, these non-significant findings also reflect the ongoing difficulty in replicability of results using tDCS (Horvath et al, 2014), and to a more limited extent, aerobic exercise (Mellow et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the non-significant effects of a-tDCS and highintensity interval exercise on motor learning were unexpected in the current study, it is notable that two recent studies investigating the combination of a-tDCS and aerobic exercise on executive functions also reported no significant benefit on cognitive performance (Hendy et al, 2019;Thomas et al, 2020). While these studies had differences in protocol, including difference in cognitive tasks and stimulated regions, making them not directly comparable, these non-significant findings also reflect the ongoing difficulty in replicability of results using tDCS (Horvath et al, 2014), and to a more limited extent, aerobic exercise (Mellow et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…While these studies had differences in protocol, including difference in cognitive tasks and stimulated regions, making them not directly comparable, these non-significant findings also reflect the ongoing difficulty in replicability of results using tDCS ( Horvath et al, 2014 ), and to a more limited extent, aerobic exercise ( Mellow et al, 2020 ). Individual differences in the response to tDCS have been observed ( Filmer et al, 2019 ), and it may be that exercise induces individualized responses too ( Hendy et al, 2019 ). These differences have been shown to include response modulation from base levels of gamma-aminobutyric acid and glutamate, known to relate to neurochemical excitability ( Filmer et al, 2019 ), and the direction of response achieved (excitatory or inhibitory) ( Wiethoff et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we used a design where exercise preceded tDCS, which was presented while participants performed cognitive tasks. Alternatively, both tDCS could have been administered during the treadmill activity or simultaneous exercise and neurostimulation, or tDCS could have preceded the exercise activity [93]. Both alternatives are worthy of additional investigation to gain a deeper understanding of the interactive effects of each enhancement technique.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%