2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2022.463255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High information spectroscopic detection techniques for gas chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, the majority of drug-detection methods using analytical systems are undertaken using chromatography-based techniques (gas chromatography (GC) and HPLC), spectroscopy techniques (refractive index (RI), UV-Vis, fluorescence, evaporative light scattering, and NMR), or hyphenated approaches (GC-MS and HPLC-MS). Each of these techniques has their own advantages and disadvantages, but among them, three systems are more popular, especially when it comes to drug analysis: UV, fluorescence and MS [133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140][141]. While such techniques have proved to be reliable and allow the analysis and detection of almost all molecules of interest in various samples, they still have unsolvable issues.…”
Section: Comparison Of Electrochemical Sensing and Other Conventional...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the majority of drug-detection methods using analytical systems are undertaken using chromatography-based techniques (gas chromatography (GC) and HPLC), spectroscopy techniques (refractive index (RI), UV-Vis, fluorescence, evaporative light scattering, and NMR), or hyphenated approaches (GC-MS and HPLC-MS). Each of these techniques has their own advantages and disadvantages, but among them, three systems are more popular, especially when it comes to drug analysis: UV, fluorescence and MS [133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140][141]. While such techniques have proved to be reliable and allow the analysis and detection of almost all molecules of interest in various samples, they still have unsolvable issues.…”
Section: Comparison Of Electrochemical Sensing and Other Conventional...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques utilize the similar method of ion-pair extraction of the gas and quantification by MS and may detect the concentrations as low as ppm [13]. However, the most significant limitations of these techniques are typically very time consuming, expensive, require skilled technicians, off-site analyses, and matrix-matched calibration standards that are not routinely determined [14]. To overcome these issues, various other techniques have been considered to detect hydrogen, e.g., electrochemical [15], catalyst [16], resistance based [17], and optical methods [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flame ionization detector (FID) has had a significant and consistent role due to its selectivity for compounds containing carbon bonds and its reliability for accurate quantitative data. The primary disadvantage is that the FID does not provide any qualitative information 10 . Mass spectrometry (MS) is another standard detector in fuel analysis, as it is a nearly universal detector that provides structural information and quantitative data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary disadvantage is that the FID does not provide any qualitative information. 10 Mass spectrometry (MS) is another standard detector in fuel analysis, as it is a nearly universal detector that provides structural information and quantitative data. Specifically, high‐resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) has been utilized in petroleomics, the complete characterization of petroleum down to the molecular level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%