2012
DOI: 10.1159/000341541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Incidence of Triple-Negative Tumors in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Prospective Study of Breast Cancer Characteristics and Risk Factors in Malian Women Seen in a Bamako University Hospital

Abstract: Objective: Few studies have been conducted on breast cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa and their results have been suspected to be impaired by artefacts. This prospective study was designed to determine tumor and patient characteristics in Mali with control of each methodological step. These data are necessary to define breast cancer treatment guidelines in this country. Methods: Clinical and tumor characteristics and known risk factors were obtained in a consecutive series of 114 patients. Each technical step for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
53
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
14
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common method for assessing receptor status was monoclonal assays (i.e., the quantitative enzyme immunoassay and, more often, the semi-quantitative IHC approach), but ER status was ascertained by ligand binding assays (e.g., dextran-coated charcoal [DCC] method) in some earlier studies (Tables 1 and 2) [51],[89]–[91]. FISH, CISH, or SISH to ascertain the HER2 status of specimens with an equivocal IHC score of 2+ was only performed in a few studies (Tables 1 and 2) [34],[42],[48],[55],[65],[69],[76],[78],[82],[84],[87].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common method for assessing receptor status was monoclonal assays (i.e., the quantitative enzyme immunoassay and, more often, the semi-quantitative IHC approach), but ER status was ascertained by ligand binding assays (e.g., dextran-coated charcoal [DCC] method) in some earlier studies (Tables 1 and 2) [51],[89]–[91]. FISH, CISH, or SISH to ascertain the HER2 status of specimens with an equivocal IHC score of 2+ was only performed in a few studies (Tables 1 and 2) [34],[42],[48],[55],[65],[69],[76],[78],[82],[84],[87].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the absence of HR status testing in most African settings is a major deficiency in care that requires correction, not only in Malawi but throughout the region. HR positivity varies widely across Africa, 4,12,13 and routine testing would ensure that women with HR-negative cancers are spared ineffective hormonal therapy. It would also identify many women who would benefit from tamoxifen, which is relatively inexpensive, well-tolerated, and available in Malawi.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conclusion: Multilevel interventions are needed to ensure access, availability, and affordability of a minimum standard of care for breast cancer patients in sub-Saharan Africa. [13,14]. To understand major barriers to early diagnosis and treatment, we used the model of pathway to treatment [15] recommended by the Aarhus statement [16] which is intended to improve the design and reporting of studies on delayed diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%