2007
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta:20060418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-gain nonlinear observer design using the observer canonical form

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Liu (2004) proposed an algorithm for state observer design of two-dimensional linear shift-invariant systems via using the well-known one-dimensional system results. Röbenack and Lynch (2006) proposed two methods for nonlinear observer design which are based on a partial nonlinear observer canonical form. Moreover, Sliding Mode Observer (SMO) design of an uncertain system is an important issue of recent discussion.…”
Section: X(t) = (A + δA)x(t) + (A D + δA D )X(t − τ ) + (B + δB)u(t) mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu (2004) proposed an algorithm for state observer design of two-dimensional linear shift-invariant systems via using the well-known one-dimensional system results. Röbenack and Lynch (2006) proposed two methods for nonlinear observer design which are based on a partial nonlinear observer canonical form. Moreover, Sliding Mode Observer (SMO) design of an uncertain system is an important issue of recent discussion.…”
Section: X(t) = (A + δA)x(t) + (A D + δA D )X(t − τ ) + (B + δB)u(t) mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximations of nonlinearities in the canonical form (which results in ELO) have already been suggested (Bestle & Zeitz, 1983), and this approach can be extended to higher order approximations (Röbenack & Lynch, 2004). An observer using a partial nonlinear observer canonical form (POCF) (Röbenack & Lynch, 2006) has weaker observability and integrability existence conditions than the well-established non-linear observer canonical form (OCF). Non-linear sliding mode observers use a quasi-Newtonian approach, applied after pseudo-derivations of the output signal (Efimov & Fridman, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exists a sustained error between the steady state values of the actual and the observed states. Different types of such observers, like Luenberger observers, reduced order Luenberger observers [6]- [13], sliding mode observers [14]- [18] are mentioned in literatures. To minimize the steady state observer error in presence of disturbances, full order observers with integral action have been proposed in literatures [1]- [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%