2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00383-020-04740-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-frequency vs. conventional ventilation at the time of CDH repair is not associated with higher mortality and oxygen dependency: a retrospective cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That study, however, is limited by its retrospective nature, although propensity score matching was performed to reduce potential confounding. Furthermore, no significant difference was reported between mode of respiratory support (HFOV or CMV) at the time of surgical repair when considering oxygen dependency or death at 28 days (16). Use of high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may cause lung injury by over-inflation of the ipsilateral lung during HFOV and the ensuing pulmonary inflammatory response (12,17).…”
Section: Initial Ventilatory Management Pre-surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That study, however, is limited by its retrospective nature, although propensity score matching was performed to reduce potential confounding. Furthermore, no significant difference was reported between mode of respiratory support (HFOV or CMV) at the time of surgical repair when considering oxygen dependency or death at 28 days (16). Use of high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may cause lung injury by over-inflation of the ipsilateral lung during HFOV and the ensuing pulmonary inflammatory response (12,17).…”
Section: Initial Ventilatory Management Pre-surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association between iNO, HFOV, Prostin, and death indicates that these therapies were applied to the sickest babies. We suggest the failure of others to demonstrate this indicates the therapies being applied to babies who could have survived without their use 30 31. Some reports use iNO in 70% of cases,32 which seems difficult to reconcile with our figure of 45% of cases requiring iNO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Two retrospective studies comparing conventional ventilation with high-frequency ventilation (HFV) were unable to show any difference in survival, need for inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), duration of mechanical ventilation or oxygen requirement at discharge. The study by Derraugh et al 49 was based on experience at a single non-ECLS centre over a 25-year period. The HFV group included patients managed with both high-frequency jet ventilation and HFOV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%