2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.01.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High frequency seismic waves and slab structures beneath Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subducted slabs also have the capacity to duct high-frequency energy from deep events, with most notable effects seen in old slabs, for example, Japan (Furumura & Kennett 2005), Indonesia and Italy (Sun et al 2014), but also for younger slabs in southwestern Japan and Taiwan (Chen et al 2013). This guided energy too can be explained with a similar model of heterogeneity.…”
Section: O N C L U S I O N Smentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Subducted slabs also have the capacity to duct high-frequency energy from deep events, with most notable effects seen in old slabs, for example, Japan (Furumura & Kennett 2005), Indonesia and Italy (Sun et al 2014), but also for younger slabs in southwestern Japan and Taiwan (Chen et al 2013). This guided energy too can be explained with a similar model of heterogeneity.…”
Section: O N C L U S I O N Smentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Sun et al (2014) discuss a number of mechanisms that might help to preserve such heterogeneity. As noted in Paper I, our preferred class of lithosphere heterogeneity has a strong resemblance to a frozen version of the mille-feuille model proposed by Kawakatsu et al (2009) for asthenospheric structure including melt pods beneath the Philippine Sea Plate.…”
Section: O N C L U S I O N Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Obviously, the wider the seismic velocity distribution, the higher is the radial anisotropy (Figure ). For skew‐normal distributions analogous to those inferred from the scattering of P waves propagating through the lithosphere (Furumura & Kennett, ; Sun et al, ), radial anisotropy is only about 0.2% when the distribution is symmetric, and progressively decreases with increasing asymmetry of the distribution.…”
Section: Quantification Of Extrinsic Seismic Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Symmetric and asymmetric distributions are given by w()x=2ωϕ()xξωnormalΦ()α()xξω, where ϕ()x=12πex22, normalΦ()x=12[]1+erf()x2, ξ is the location (Vs = 4,619 m/s; Vp= 8,000 m/s; Poisson ratio = 0.25; density = 3,300 kg/m 3 ), ω is the scale (for symmetric—Gaussian—distributions it is the standard deviation; shown as percentage of ξ ), α is the shape (−2, 0, 2 for left‐skewed, symmetric, right‐skewed distributions). Inset: Vp distributions with ω = 2.5% (as from P wave scattering data in the lithosphere; e.g., Furumura & Kennett, ; Sun et al, ), which generate radial anisotropy of about 0.1–0.2%. In a two‐component system with ω = 2.5% and 50:50 phase proportions, w Vs (4,537 m/s, 4,700 m/s) = w Vp (7,859 m/s, 8,141 m/s) = (0.5, 0.5), and radial anisotropy is about 0.1 (%).…”
Section: Quantification Of Extrinsic Seismic Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%