2011
DOI: 10.1177/1352458511411063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High frequency of co-infection by Epstein–Barr virus types 1 and 2 in patients with multiple sclerosis

Abstract: This study provides molecular evidence associating co-infection of type 1 and 2 EBV with MS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In all cases, the consensus sequence deriving from deep sequencing coincided with the one determined by Sanger sequencing, confirming the cosegregation of newly identified variants with the known EBNA2 alleles. We also found one or more variable positions in all HDs (1-17) and individuals with MS (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). For all couples of variants lying on the same read (coverage $50), the hypothesis of independent segregation, indicative of random sequencing errors, was rejected through a x 2 test (p , 0.05), thus supporting the coexistence of different genotypes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In all cases, the consensus sequence deriving from deep sequencing coincided with the one determined by Sanger sequencing, confirming the cosegregation of newly identified variants with the known EBNA2 alleles. We also found one or more variable positions in all HDs (1-17) and individuals with MS (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). For all couples of variants lying on the same read (coverage $50), the hypothesis of independent segregation, indicative of random sequencing errors, was rejected through a x 2 test (p , 0.05), thus supporting the coexistence of different genotypes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…7 To disclose possible MS-related EBV strains, various groups have followed a candidate-gene approach. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Along the same line, we chose to investigate EBV variability in MS by studying Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 2 (EBNA2). EBNA2 is, in principle, the best candidate for this kind of study because it is the most polymorphic among all EBV genes: 5 major alleles of the EBV type 1 strain, the most frequent strain in the general Caucasian population, 15 have been identified based on nucleotide variations within the most variable region of EBNA2, which is also involved in the interaction with host proteins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding only the two major EBV types, rates of coinfection of EBV type 1 and type 2 range from 0% to 53% (Kunimoto et al 1992; Srivastava et al 2000; Walling et al 2003). High frequency of coinfection with both type 1 and type 2 EBV has been reported in MS patients (Santón et al 2011). Given that we do not find evidence of coinfection by different natural EBV types, it is worth noting that we might have underestimated intraindividual EBV diversity if our variants came only from a dominant isolate or the LCLs that were sequenced within the 1kG Project were the result of a selection bias toward transformation-competent EBV isolates (Tierney et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Levin et al [7], the elevation of antibody titres to EBNA-1, seen in future MS patients during their early 20s, suggests a more severe or more recent primary infection or reactivation of a preexisting infection, accompanied by a vigorous cellular immune response. Very recently, Santon et al [34] detected dual infection by both types (1 and 2) of EBV in 63 patients (90%) and 46 controls (37·4%). Logistic regression models showed a significant (P < 0·001) association between MS and dual-type infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%