2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-frequency hearing in seals and sea lions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
44
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, there is clear potential that the acoustic signals produced by some sonar systems could elicit behavioural responses in these species (Hastie, Donovan, Götz, & Janik, ). However, the fundamental frequency of the sonar used in the current study (720 kHz) was well above the effective hearing range of harbour seals (Cunningham & Reichmuth, ), and recordings indicate that low‐frequency components of the signal are relatively low in amplitude (Hastie, ); this suggests that the risk of this sonar system eliciting behavioural responses by harbour seals is relatively small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Therefore, there is clear potential that the acoustic signals produced by some sonar systems could elicit behavioural responses in these species (Hastie, Donovan, Götz, & Janik, ). However, the fundamental frequency of the sonar used in the current study (720 kHz) was well above the effective hearing range of harbour seals (Cunningham & Reichmuth, ), and recordings indicate that low‐frequency components of the signal are relatively low in amplitude (Hastie, ); this suggests that the risk of this sonar system eliciting behavioural responses by harbour seals is relatively small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Audiograms reported by Kastak and Schusterman (), Hemilä et al . (), and Cunningham and Reichmuth () in NES and other phocid seals present with an abrupt curve into high‐frequency range starting roughly at 50 kHz. Such results strongly match with our mathematical simulation where markedly increased displacement of stapes footplate occurs at the same frequency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…While many recent studies have sought to address the effects of underwater noise on cetaceans (Nowacek, Thorne, Johnston, & Tyack, 2007), comparatively less is known about exposure and reactions to noise in pinnipeds while at sea. Like cetaceans, pinnipeds have sensitive underwater hearing; their full hearing range extends from a few hundred Hz to 70-80 kHz (Cunningham & Reichmuth, 2016;Hemilä, Nummela, Berta, & Reuter, 2006). They rely on sound for communication (Mathevon, Casey, Reichmuth, & Charrier, 2017;Van Parijs, Hastie, & Thompson, 1999), predator detection (Deecke, Slater, & Ford, 2002), and possibly also for navigation and listening for prey (Schusterman, Levenson, Reichmuth, & Southall, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%