2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2007.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-frequency eddy current conductivity spectroscopy for residual stress profiling in surface-treated nickel-base superalloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 7 shows the electrical resistivity, ρ 1 , calculated using the model shown in Fig. 2(a), varying with equibiaxial compressive stress, calculated using (9) and (10). The resistivity at σ b = 0 MPa, ρ 0 MPa , is taken as a reference value, where ρ 0 MPa = 74 × 10 −8 m [13, pp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 7 shows the electrical resistivity, ρ 1 , calculated using the model shown in Fig. 2(a), varying with equibiaxial compressive stress, calculated using (9) and (10). The resistivity at σ b = 0 MPa, ρ 0 MPa , is taken as a reference value, where ρ 0 MPa = 74 × 10 −8 m [13, pp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of methods that use electromagnetic properties to evaluate the residual stress in the surface layers of metallic components, such as the potential drop technique [6], the Barkhausen method [7], and the eddy current method [5,8,9]. In the present paper, we examine the eddy current method in order to establish a rapid nondestructive test for measuring stress in the surface layers of various metallic materials, including paramagnetic and ferromagnetic materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of methods aimed at inspecting and quantifying residual stress levels non-destructively have been proposed; many of these are based on measurements of electromagnetic properties [3][4][5] , Barkhausen noise measurements being recognized as one of the most promising alternatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The depth of conductivity change due to shot peening is 50-200 m from the surface, which requires high frequency electrical conductivity spectroscopy. Abu-Nabah and Nagy (2007) reported that residual stress is significantly underestimated when it is calculated from apparent eddy current conductivity (AECC) and piezoresistivity coefficient. It is observed in the present study that increase or decrease in electrical conductivity can be under predicted, if material isotropy is assumed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%