2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High frequency distortion product otoacoustic emissions in children with and without middle ear dysfunction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…studied DPOAEs in conventional and ultra-high frequencies in children with and without middle-ear dysfunction. 11 Their results showed a significant reduction in DPOAE amplitude and signal-to-noise ratio at 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 13 kHz for the ‘fail immittance’ group when compared to the ‘pass immittance’ group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…studied DPOAEs in conventional and ultra-high frequencies in children with and without middle-ear dysfunction. 11 Their results showed a significant reduction in DPOAE amplitude and signal-to-noise ratio at 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 13 kHz for the ‘fail immittance’ group when compared to the ‘pass immittance’ group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…was higher than that reported in the present study for both the control and clinical groups. 11 The differences in DPOAE amplitude between the two studies could be attributed to the differences in participants’ age ranges in the two studies; that is, children versus adult participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DPOAEs are clinically useful in identifying middle ear effusion in infants and children (Choi, Pafitis, Herer, Zalzal, & Patel, 1999;Kei, Brazel, Crebbin, Richards, & Willeston, 2007;Yeo, Park, Park, & Suh, 2002). Two studies using older children (over 5 years of age) concluded that DPOAEs better differentiated between normal and diseased ears (Akdogan & Özkan, 2006;Thakur et al, 2013).…”
Section: Evoked Otoacoustic Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of these studies, one conducted by Wake et al (2006) and Lyons, Kei, and the other by Driscoll (2004) shared the same cohort of school children as Driscoll et al (2001) and Cone et al (2010), respectively, and were subsequently excluded. The study conducted by Kei, Brazel, Crebbin, Richards, and Willeston (2007) was also excluded from further analysis due to small sample size (n = 50) and non-representative sample (participants were recruited from a single primary school in the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia). As a result, three independent studies by Driscoll et al (2001), Cone et al (2010) and Keogh et al (2010) were included for further analysis in this review.…”
Section: Definition Of Degrees Of Hearing Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%