2023
DOI: 10.1108/ajeb-05-2022-0051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-frequency CSI300 futures trading volume predicting through the neural network

Xiaojie Xu,
Yun Zhang

Abstract: PurposeFor policymakers and participants of financial markets, predictions of trading volumes of financial indices are important issues. This study aims to address such a prediction problem based on the CSI300 nearby futures by using high-frequency data recorded each minute from the launch date of the futures to roughly two years after constituent stocks of the futures all becoming shortable, a time period witnessing significantly increased trading activities.Design/methodology/approachIn order to answer quest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we also consider the scaled conjugate gradient (SCG) (Møller, 1993) and Bayesian regularization (BR) (MacKay, 1992) algorithms. The SCG and BR algorithms, as well as the LM algorithm, have been explored in different varieties of fields (Xu and Zhang, 2021a, 2022a, b, d, h, 2023f, j, p, t, u; Doan and Liong, 2004; Xu and Zhang, 2023n; Kayri, 2016; Khan et al ., 2019; Selvamuthu et al ., 2019). Comparative research of these algorithms can be seen from the literature (Baghirli, 2015; Xu and Zhang, 2022m, 2023a, k, m; Al Bataineh and Kaur, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we also consider the scaled conjugate gradient (SCG) (Møller, 1993) and Bayesian regularization (BR) (MacKay, 1992) algorithms. The SCG and BR algorithms, as well as the LM algorithm, have been explored in different varieties of fields (Xu and Zhang, 2021a, 2022a, b, d, h, 2023f, j, p, t, u; Doan and Liong, 2004; Xu and Zhang, 2023n; Kayri, 2016; Khan et al ., 2019; Selvamuthu et al ., 2019). Comparative research of these algorithms can be seen from the literature (Baghirli, 2015; Xu and Zhang, 2022m, 2023a, k, m; Al Bataineh and Kaur, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…we have taken into consideration the balance between model performance and stabilities in determining the final specification (Xu and Zhang, 2023h). As compared to econometric models, machine learning models might also be subject to increased complexities in terms of model implementations.…”
Section: Office Property Price Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it is worth noting that similar to econometric models, machine learning models, including NNs, used for forecasting purposes could be subject to the issue of overfitting or underfitting. Thus, in building NN models for forecasts of office property price indices here, we have taken into consideration the balance between model performance and stabilities in determining the final specification (Xu and Zhang, 2023h). As compared to econometric models, machine learning models might also be subject to increased complexities in terms of model implementations.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The auto-regressive integrated moving average model (ARIMA), vector auto-regressive model (VAR), and vector error correction model (VECM) are among the most popular and powerful approaches to tackle numerous price forecasting tasks in this area. In recent years, as computing resources and tools are becoming continuously easier and more affordable to reach [100], researchers across the globe have started to show continuously increasing interest in exploring applications of machine learning techniques [101] for the purpose of forecasting commodity prices. Corresponding studies in the literature have covered many different commodities from different economic sectors and industries, including but not limited to those in the agricultural sector, such as soybeans [102][103][104][105][106][107][108], soybean oil [109][110][111], palm oil [112], sugar [113][114][115][116][117][118], corn [102,113,[119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131], wheat [105,[132][133][134][135][136][137][138]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The auto-regressive integrated moving average model (ARIMA), vector auto-regressive model (VAR), and vector error correction model (VECM) are among the most popular and powerful approaches to tackle numerous price forecasting tasks in this area. In recent years, as computing resources and tools are becoming continuously easier and more affordable to reach [100], researchers across the globe have started to show continuously increasing interest in exploring applications of machine learning techniques [101] for the purpose of forecasting commodity prices. Corresponding studies in the literature have covered many different commodities from different economic sectors and industries, including but not limited to those in the agricultural sector, such as soybeans [102108], soybean oil [109–111], palm oil [112], sugar [113118], corn [102, 113, 119131], wheat [105, 132139], coffee [140146], oats [147], cotton [132, 148], canola [149151], peanut oil [152158], green beans [159, 160], and edible oil [112, 153, 161164], those in the energy sector, such as electricity [165169], carbon emission allowances [170174], coal [175179], crude oil [180184], heating oil [185189], and natural gas [190194], and those in the metal sector, such as lead [195], copper [<...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%