2012
DOI: 10.4187/respcare.01725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Frequency Chest Wall Compressions: Good for the Patient? Good for the Clinician?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[4,23] Chatburn [15] reported that HFCWO may trigger a ventilator because the sensitivity of triggering a ventilator is usually set at very low pressure or flow (i.e., −2 cm H 2 O or 3 L/min), and because VEST changes the background pressure or inspired flow by more than -2 cm H 2 O or 3 L/min. [15] However, we did not observe any significant changes with regards to the ventilator settings (Table 2, all P  > 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4,23] Chatburn [15] reported that HFCWO may trigger a ventilator because the sensitivity of triggering a ventilator is usually set at very low pressure or flow (i.e., −2 cm H 2 O or 3 L/min), and because VEST changes the background pressure or inspired flow by more than -2 cm H 2 O or 3 L/min. [15] However, we did not observe any significant changes with regards to the ventilator settings (Table 2, all P  > 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%