2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.01.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High flux hydrophobic membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN)—Interfacial polymerization, surface modification and solvent activation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A commonly applied post‐treatment of TFC membranes, a 24 h immersion in DMF, caused the EtOH permeance of the IL system to increase from 0.61±0.07 to 0.84±0.04 L m −2 h −1 bar −1 (factor 1.31), together with a decrease in RB passage (i.e., 100 % retention) of 55 %. However, the use of DMF would make this membrane preparation system significantly less sustainable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A commonly applied post‐treatment of TFC membranes, a 24 h immersion in DMF, caused the EtOH permeance of the IL system to increase from 0.61±0.07 to 0.84±0.04 L m −2 h −1 bar −1 (factor 1.31), together with a decrease in RB passage (i.e., 100 % retention) of 55 %. However, the use of DMF would make this membrane preparation system significantly less sustainable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparably, previous attempts to analyze the feasbility of microporous materials for aqueous separations demonstrated improved permeance but coupled with significant losses in solute rejection and MWCO as shown for Tröger's base PIMs (TB‐OH and TB‐OH CS) and covalent organic framework (COF)‐based membranes (M‐TpBD) in Figure 3b. [ 50,51 ] The ability to couple high permeance with high rejection truly differentiates the MPDTrip TFCs in this study to previous approaches which resulted in permeance gains with significant rejection losses for liquid separations [ 27,50–59 ] and fills a consistently reiterated need in the chemical industry. [ 48,49,66,67 ]…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 93%
“…c) Permeance of methanol versus selectivity for small solutes (210–320 g mol −1 ) for state‐of‐the‐art TFCs. Comparative data were obtained from the literature [ 27,52–59 ] with details shown in Table S12 in the Supporting Information. d) Sodium chloride rejection comparison of the MPDTrip‐20 TFC membrane fabricated in this study with state‐of‐the‐art desalination membranes.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies performed by Teixeira et al [6], with hydrophobic commercial membrane Puramen s , demonstrated permeability of 0.23, 0.16, 0.0015 L h À 1 m À 2 bar À 1 for n-hexane, ethanol and oleic acid, respectively. Jimenez Solomon et al [7] studied the permeate flux of nanofiltration Starmen TM and Puramem s of a feed solution comprising polystyrene oligomers dissolved in toluene, in operation conditions of 30 bar and 30 o C, and found fluxes between 18 and 114 L h À 1 m À 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%