2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation in adults with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: A systematic review

Abstract: This review suggests that HFNC may be superior to COT in AHRF patients in terms of oxygenation, patient comfort, and work of breathing. It may be reasonable to consider HFNC as an intermediate level of oxygen therapy between COT and NIV.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
96
2
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
96
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In these conditions, the increased oxygen cost of breathing may contribute to increased energy cost during activities of daily living adding, particularly in diseases imposing a ventilator or cardiac constraint, an extra contribution to the reduced exercise capacity. Several interventions have been used in different patient populations to reduce WOB, which has a potential impact on reducing the oxygen cost of breathing, namely, invasive and noninvasive ventilation [248][249][250], high flow nasal oxygen [248,251], ventilation with heliox [252], respiratory muscle training [253,254] and exercise training [255].…”
Section: Oxygen Cost Of Breathingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these conditions, the increased oxygen cost of breathing may contribute to increased energy cost during activities of daily living adding, particularly in diseases imposing a ventilator or cardiac constraint, an extra contribution to the reduced exercise capacity. Several interventions have been used in different patient populations to reduce WOB, which has a potential impact on reducing the oxygen cost of breathing, namely, invasive and noninvasive ventilation [248][249][250], high flow nasal oxygen [248,251], ventilation with heliox [252], respiratory muscle training [253,254] and exercise training [255].…”
Section: Oxygen Cost Of Breathingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dennoch konnte in der Studie eindrucksvoll gezeigt werden, dass unter High-Flow-Sauerstoffgabe die Intubationsrate am geringsten war, insbesondere bei schwerer respiratorischer Insuffizienz mit einem Horovitz-Quotienten (PaO 2 /FiO 2 ) von < 200 mmHg. Auch wenn die High-Flow-Sauerstoffgabe noch mit wenigen Studiendaten untermauert ist, wird sie bereits jetzt bei schwerer respiratorischer Insuffizienz der konventionellen Sauerstofftherapie vorgezogen [418].…”
Section: High-flow-sauerstoffunclassified
“…Among patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, the rates of intubation and of death are reportedly equivalent regardless of the prior use of HFNC, conventional oxygen therapy, or NPPV [1][2][3]. A prospective interventional study in which HFNC and NPPV were applied alternately in 14 patients with acute respiratory failure reported significantly better comfort with HFNC (on a 10-point scale: HFNC, 2.7 ± 1.8 vs. NPPV, 5.4 ± 3.1; p < 0.05), and the dyspnea score was significantly higher with HFNC (Borg scale: HFNC, 2.9 ± 1.8 vs. NPPV, 5.0 ± 3.3; p < 0.05) [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, the use of HFNC is associated with rates of intubation and death equivalent to rates with commonly used conventional oxygen therapy and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) [1][2][3]. In addition, HFNC has characteristics that greatly contribute to maintaining a better quality of life (QOL), such as allowing oral intake, oral care, and conversation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%