1985
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-13504-9_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High field magnetic confinement of fusion plasmas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ion energy is reduced to 28 eV for a mirror ratio of 3, and to 12 eV for a mirror ratio of 2 ( Figure 15). The corresponding magnetic field strengths are reduced from 18 Tesla with no mirror losses to 16 Tesla when R-=3 and 15 Tesla when %=2, indicating that the relativistic charged particle pressure rather than the plasma thermal pressure plays a dominant role in defining the minimum magnetic field strengths. Assuming a mirror ratio of 2, the specific impulse is 4950 seconds, and the normalized engine thrust is 8.1 x N.s/cnia.…”
Section: High Number Density Hydrogen Plasmamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The ion energy is reduced to 28 eV for a mirror ratio of 3, and to 12 eV for a mirror ratio of 2 ( Figure 15). The corresponding magnetic field strengths are reduced from 18 Tesla with no mirror losses to 16 Tesla when R-=3 and 15 Tesla when %=2, indicating that the relativistic charged particle pressure rather than the plasma thermal pressure plays a dominant role in defining the minimum magnetic field strengths. Assuming a mirror ratio of 2, the specific impulse is 4950 seconds, and the normalized engine thrust is 8.1 x N.s/cnia.…”
Section: High Number Density Hydrogen Plasmamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For the reasons mentioned above, high field devices have attracted attention, even though the mechanical forces acting on the magnets and the requirements of energy dissipation in the coils pose formidable technological problems [5]. Furthermore, since the average thermal wall loading for a given nr E scales as n 2 aT, it is expected that for compact devices at very high fields acceptable values of wall loading will eventually be surpassed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%